BigJohnsPens
Well-known member
McGree not starting was very odd!
McGree has been injured.. so yesI'm not getting at him. I actually don't mind him either. He's feisty and has a bit of talent
But
Is he better than mcgree on the left? No
Is he better than Crooks/Rogers at no10? No (TBC if he's better than azaz)
He's playing ST because we have no one else
Are you sure?McGree has been injured.. so yes
Playing for Australia tooAre you sure?
Purely this, if he is carrying an injury why not start with him and see what the worst is?Not starting McGree was really poor.
Scott said on the 12th man pod that he see's Lath, Coburn, Forss and Greenwood as strikersHow can a club with a much vaunted recruitment team continue to put a team on the pitch without a recognised CF*
At one stage we had three loan players in the pitch from teams within the same division as us.
Not a great selection of players available to Carrick today. But he chose Hackney to play where he did and not start McGree. That’s on him. Also Barlaser was having a very poor day, but didn’t take him off. Maybe man management and looking after the individual but the team was not good enough today in any department
* I only count Lath and Coburn and they are both consistently injured and inconsistent in performance when fit.
Words.Scott said on the 12th man pod that he see's Lath, Coburn, Forss and Greenwood as strikers
Scott said on the 12th man pod that he see's Lath, Coburn, Forss and Greenwood as strikers