Can the UK rejoin the EU?

It was a project of ideals and unfortunately ideals are costly.

It was based almost entirely on emotion, and English exceptionalism. Nobody can remember what collective facts were used in arguments as to the economic benefits of leaving. All the supposed replacement trade deals never measured up…and literally cost 4% of GDP.
Never mind the fact of the small detail that it turns out the whole sorry mess was judged, in law, to be illegal..
 
It was based almost entirely on emotion, and English exceptionalism. Nobody can remember what collective facts were used in arguments as to the economic benefits of leaving. All the supposed replacement trade deals never measured up…and literally cost 4% of GDP.
Never mind the fact of the small detail that it turns out the whole sorry mess was judged, in law, to be illegal..
All this is true, but plenty of people voted for it in good faith and have been let down. The current situation is untenable and the sooner we resolve to address that the better.

But we can't ignore the sovereignty argument. I don't agree with it and feel that the idea of unencumbered sovereignty is a thing of the past for non-superpowers.
 
I
But we can't ignore the sovereignty argument. I don't agree with it and feel that the idea of unencumbered sovereignty is a thing of the past for non-superpowers.

Theresa May used the idea regarding sovereignty in a speech, which I can’t find at the moment. But do remember this line, because which seems contain a contradiction of itself.

“Of course we retained sovereignty within the EU, it was just at times it didn’t feel like it”


.
 
What you're saying goes against official statistics

If Brexit is so bad why are you literally lying and spreading fake news.

Sounds like Project fear to me

So again which company and where in the EU are you posting from?
It sounds absolutely valid to me. Looks like you've been reading too much Daily Heil.
 
It's not really a red herring. Jsut a fact that one of the most persistent brexit lies is we will lose the pound. Which would suggest that all EU countries have the euro. Which is untrue. Thays all I was trying to counter.

I don't think Sweden will join the euro. I know they once had a referendum where the pro euro campaign told them they would have tax cuts. Which they quite rightly translated as cuts to services and rejected it
Fair enough. Bad choice of words. There is a material difference between Denmark and Sweden. But it gives more power to your main point, that the “must join the euro” argument is simplistic because there are at least two very different models by which member states haven’t, by negotiating an opt out, and by not quite getting round to it forever.
 
It was based almost entirely on emotion,
That’s hard to argue with.
and English exceptionalism.
That’s simplistic to the point of being racist. There was a majority in Wales for leaving, which can hardly have been English exceptionalism. The single ethnic group in these islands that was most strongly in favour of leaving was one of those in Northern Ireland, which would certainly not be considered English. And there was a non-trivial vote to leave in Scotland, which far exceeded any population there that might identify English.

Calling leave voters English exceptionalists is probably a bigger trivialising calumny than calling them thick racists.
Nobody can remember what collective facts were used in arguments as to the economic benefits of leaving. All the supposed replacement trade deals never measured up…and literally cost 4% of GDP.
Never mind the fact of the small detail that it turns out the whole sorry mess was judged, in law, to be illegal..
Still fighting the wrong battle as well. The vote was whether to remain or leave. As with all separatist votes, the sole or primary objective of the separatist is to separate. You are wasting your time in arguing over percentages of GDP. You have to win the separatist/unionist argument. We lost, because we didn’t even fight it.
 
I hope not. I'm was a remainer, but not now. The EU is a busted flush and illegal immigration, Europe wide, will be even more of an issue in the months and years to come.

#UTB
 
E
English exceptionalism

No. I don’t for a one minute consider the argument that this equates with calling anybody anything. It’s not what I do and not the way I think.
Also I don’t consider leave voters “Thick racists”
More it is something that is used and on occasions a phrase that other countries politicians describe English governments with. It was certainly employed by elements in the vote leave campaign. It’s a political tool that is constantly used. But that will change eventually.

The fact that was essentially illegal bothers me more.
 
E

No. I don’t for a one minute consider the argument that this equates with calling anybody anything. It’s not what I do and not the way I think.
Also I don’t consider leave voters “Thick racists”
More it is something that is used and on occasions a phrase that other countries politicians describe English governments with. It was certainly employed by elements in the vote leave campaign. It’s a political tool that is constantly used. But that will change eventually.

The fact that was essentially illegal bothers me more.
If other countries think there are English governments, then they need to learn some history. So far as I am aware, in the sense that 21st century definitions of England would apply, there hasn’t been an English government since 1542. Even allowing a generous definition there hasn’t been once since 1707. I would be disturbed if any of our politicians thought the Kingdom of Prussia or the Republic of Venice still existed (despite both of those persisting into the 19th century) and I will be equally disturbed if there are genuinely foreign politicians who are so uneducated as to think England still exists.
 
The current Parliament seems to have had an English Nationalist Party in power for the last 13 years.
Ask the other members of the United Kingdom how they see it
 
I would be disturbed if any of our politicians thought the Kingdom of Prussia or the Republic of Venice still existed (despite both of those persisting into the 19th century)
You wouldn't put it past this current lot of tories though would you? Rees-Mogg fans would actually cream themselves if he said it.
 
That’s hard to argue with.

That’s simplistic to the point of being racist. There was a majority in Wales for leaving, which can hardly have been English exceptionalism. The single ethnic group in these islands that was most strongly in favour of leaving was one of those in Northern Ireland, which would certainly not be considered English. And there was a non-trivial vote to leave in Scotland, which far exceeded any population there that might identify English.

Calling leave voters English exceptionalists is probably a bigger trivialising calumny than calling them thick racists.

Still fighting the wrong battle as well. The vote was whether to remain or leave. As with all separatist votes, the sole or primary objective of the separatist is to separate. You are wasting your time in arguing over percentages of GDP. You have to win the separatist/unionist argument. We lost, because we didn’t even fight it.

You’ve just reminded me how utterly toxic remainers were for Labour at the last general election

And people wonder why Starmer repeatedly and regularly rules out rejoining 🤔
 
Fair enough. Bad choice of words. There is a material difference between Denmark and Sweden. But it gives more power to your main point, that the “must join the euro” argument is simplistic because there are at least two very different models by which member states haven’t, by negotiating an opt out, and by not quite getting round to it forever.
Yeah. I imagine, as a new member state, we'll have to take the Sweden option. Which is a shame because it means the brexiters can use that and the EU army argument in perpetuity. I can't see us getting an opt out if we rejoin but you never know
 
You’ve just reminded me how utterly toxic remainers were for Labour at the last general election

And people wonder why Starmer repeatedly and regularly rules out rejoining 🤔
That was then. Most intelligent people and the majority of the country have seen brexit for the failure it is.

Only a bizarre, cult like, fact free clan of bigots and the uneducated still think brexit is a good idea
 
Back
Top