NoloBoro
Well-known member
Some pr*ck sitting on a train, stopping me from getting home. And before I get jumped on, I do not agree with the new legislation. But, that’s just an example.
Bye bye right to peaceful protest
- Thread starter HarryVegas
- Start date
BlindBoyGrunt
Well-known member
...and I think that's what he's trying to do
Jedi boro
Well-known member
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Make no mistake this new proposed legislation is deeply concerning.
Make no mistake this new proposed legislation is deeply concerning.
NoloBoro
Well-known member
Aren’t they doing that already??
HarryVegas
Well-known member
Send him down, 10 years!!
NoloBoro
Well-known member
Not quite, you’d think people around him would say “ere mate, why sit on the train, you’re inconveniencing others, get down and get a bath”
10 years is a bit harsh, you nazi
The protest part of the bill is left wide open (annoyance clause) total catch all. Stopping anything they want.
The increasingly heavy use of Facial recognition tech.
The proposed idea to produce i.d. to vote. There’s been no cases of large scale vote fraud.
( but will certainly disenfranchise large sections of some communities)
There will be another redrawing of Parliamentary constituency boundaries. Favourable to this government.
Attempts to disallow courts to rule on Government law.
The total refusal for ministers to take any responsibility for their bad policy decisions.
The corruption of the contracting system for PPE , track and trace etc.
All that’s left, like Thatcher, is the big pay increase for the Police and armed forces.
Then it should be...Showtime!!
The increasingly heavy use of Facial recognition tech.
The proposed idea to produce i.d. to vote. There’s been no cases of large scale vote fraud.
( but will certainly disenfranchise large sections of some communities)
There will be another redrawing of Parliamentary constituency boundaries. Favourable to this government.
Attempts to disallow courts to rule on Government law.
The total refusal for ministers to take any responsibility for their bad policy decisions.
The corruption of the contracting system for PPE , track and trace etc.
All that’s left, like Thatcher, is the big pay increase for the Police and armed forces.
Then it should be...Showtime!!
SmallTown
Well-known member
I know you went to deflect and make this about me: so I'll ask you a simple yes or no question because I, like most others, I'm just bored of these one sided brexit arguments with Brexiters saying nothing: Do YOU think that one of the aims of Brexit was to take us away from the ECHR? Yes or no answerCome on then, tell me where I've insulted you, you commented on wishing I didn't exist, yet I disagreed with you so I'm insulting you,
NoloBoro
Well-known member
Is this all within the bill?
There won’t be any pay increase for anyone
SmallTown
Well-known member
So let me get this straight: You didn't vote leave, and yet when I come on attacking vote leave you post and attack me? Wow, I think that's even worse behaviour than Erimus. at least he believes in his last cause. To actually get involved in a topic just to have a go at aposter, even though you agree with them? That's a different level of pathetic right there
Erimus74
Well-known member
One sided Brexit arguments that YOU continually start, I do not have to answer to anyone how, or who I chose to vote for, I do however get involved when people call me an idiot etc, etc
SmallTown
Well-known member
I don't actually start the arguments. plenty of people point out FACTS that have occurred due to brexit. You then chose to try and argue against them. but because you can't you just fall on personal jibes and insults.
Do YOU think that one of the aims of Brexit was to take us away from the ECHR? Yes or no answer
Last edited:
Yes it was.
Now do you think if Labour win the last election and delivered Brexit would youse be talking about this Tory bill.
Last edited:
pierrequiroule
Well-known member
Can you explained your reply. Really hope you aren’t being a smartass toward me by highlighting “win” knowing I’ve mixed it up with won.
Erimus74
Well-known member
You still haven't explained where I insulted you, you go on about Brexit lying then make up something (lie) about me
WoodallServices
Well-known member
If this sort of thing was happening in Mayanmar you’d expect the government to be shouting from the rooftops!...........oh hang on a minute!!
Jedi boro
Well-known member
We have seen already how so called anti terror laws have been used on trade unions.
as make no mistake whatever the initial intent may of been for adding the law to the statute books once they are on there then they can and will be used for what ever purpose they deem fit.
plus you need to think what regimes will come in the future and how they will use these laws.
once they are on there they are very hard to take off.
as make no mistake whatever the initial intent may of been for adding the law to the statute books once they are on there then they can and will be used for what ever purpose they deem fit.
plus you need to think what regimes will come in the future and how they will use these laws.
once they are on there they are very hard to take off.