YesIs this the worst England side ever?
Yes I didn’t get that eitherThat sums it up. So called batsman takes a single and leaves no.11 to face 3 balls. No fight in them
Oh yesCan we sink any lower?
Not that it made any significant difference but I'd bin our philosophy of not having a recognised WK in the team - if Buttler (or Bairstow) can't justify a place purely on their batting then bin them .....there again, most of the other so called batsman , Root excluded, could be given the heave-hoYes I didn’t get that either
like that run made any different at all
That worked really well when Jason Roy was used a test opener!Would have done better with the 1 day or 20 20 teams
I see where you're coming from NZB, but I suppose it comes down to what is more important, the Ashes or the World Test Cricket Championship.England need to come up with a manager/coach who has a plan for 2 years time and the ECB need to back them
Use the intervening tests as experiments to see who can cope with test cricket, and go from there. You have to be brutal.
I fully agree about Foakes. He is widely regarded in the cricket world as one of the best glovemen in the around(in terms of actual wicket keeping). I think he still has more stumpings than Butler despite hardly playing.This team is a disgrace. England too long has been a boys club, and the media panders to it. Anderson and broad dropped for the first test and everyone is up in arms. Frankly the bowling in not the problem.
too many players take too long to get dropped. The biggest travesty over the last few years is the quality of foakes not being in the side. Wasted him l. Best keeper by a mile and can score runs.
England have played a lot of cricket this year so I don’t think you can you around blaming preparation. Basic application shouldn’t need preparation.
mill never understand replacing burns with Crawley. Crawley needs to go away and rediscover his form before he gets back into test cricket l, if he ever gets back in again
the writing of a 5-0 was on the wall before a ball was bowled. Burns set the tone ala harmison with the first ball
Butler doesn’t do enough batting test cricket, he gets picked for his xfactor, but he doesn’t deliver an X factor performance often enough to be picked.I fully agree about Foakes. He is widely regarded in the cricket world as one of the best glovemen in the around(in terms of actual wicket keeping). I think he still has more stumpings than Butler despite hardly playing.
That said he's been injured plenty.
Butler gets the nod because of his batting ability. Unfortunately he's bang out of form. Although some of that is due to the fact he comes in with less than a 100 on the board and has to scratch around trying to stay in often against a new ball and fresh bowlers.
The whole thing is pretty shambolic. The bowlers can come home with some ounce of self respect after various decent efforts despite dropped catches and woeful batting.
I agree. That was the main reason he's picked... Its his batting and not his keeping.Butler doesn’t do enough batting test cricket, he gets picked for his xfactor, but he doesn’t deliver an X factor performance often enough to be picked.