So you don't think the post below fits your description? Repeating something ad nauseam ????FFS its an idiom of speech for somebody repeating something ad nauseam and this particular fact is trotted out so much now its not funny and its boring. He's admitted his mistake. Far from me wanting to control anybody's comments on here but that doesn't mean I will not challenge what is said.
SmallTown has the right to repeat what he wants. If you don't want to see it there are options for you, block him, or stop following the thread.So you don't think the post below fits your description? Repeating something ad nauseam ????
SmallTown said:
As I said in my first post. It's exhausting. Brexiters will defend their failed, catastrophic ideal with anything. They'll chose anything to deflect from how bad it is.
I don't know what brings them to do this. Deep down, even they know how bad it has made the country. They can't not. And yes, it's embarrrasing to have to admit you've been conned. I would have thought it's more embarrassing to go along with the con when everyone knows it was all a lie. I don't know what must be done to educate these people.
...and I'll repeat what I want thank you. If ST calls out people for voting for Brexit then I'll remind him he voted Tory and as such also voted for Brexit so it's all goodSmallTown has the right to repeat what he wants. If you don't want to see it there are options for you, block him, or stop following the thread.
Have you been drinking?I think what we should all be able to safely agree by now is that the Conservative Party are the biggest bunch of devious, conniving, morally bankrupt, self serving set of vvankers this country has ever seen - only the royal family run them close in the parasitic blood sucking stakes. They have literally pillaged the country of almost everything over the period from 2010 to now, with more to come. If a raging mob stormed Westminster and dragged them all out and hung them from the nearest lampposts they’d only have themselves to blame
I've already said you have the right to your say, but it's a daft position to simply eradicate STs voice based on something they got wrong years ago....and I'll repeat what I want thank you. If ST calls out people for voting for Brexit then I'll remind him he voted Tory and as such also voted for Brexit so it's all good
Yes I’ve had some fresh orange juiceHave you been drinking?
And you'll still be a massive diick for doing so. Thanks...and I'll repeat what I want thank you. If ST calls out people for voting for Brexit then I'll remind him he voted Tory and as such also voted for Brexit so it's all good
Shy Tory. ThanksHave you been drinking?
Labour had a huge amount of rebuilding to do after Thatcher had run services like the NHS and education into the ground. An innovative solution was needed and PFI was the strategy. I itself not a bad one, just not executed that well.Its commonly accepted that the PFIs deals of the 1990s and 2000s were better deals for the private sector providers than the Public sector customers. The civil servants were under pressure by the Labour Government to get new schools and hospitals etc built and in general they didn't have the expertise to negotiate on a equal level with private finance and construction companies (that are profit driven). The Labour Government did not want to borrow to pay for most of its public infrastructure projects. Its a bit like people today buying flash new cars on lease deals. You get a nice new car now and appear to pay little up front, but in the long run it can be an expensive option.
Not many, and it never will, which is just another reason why brexit benefits were pie in the sky.Going back to international trade deals - how many trade deal expert negotiators does the UK civil service have?
He won’t do that because he’d rather attack insult and deflect.SmallTown has the right to repeat what he wants. If you don't want to see it there are options for you, block him, or stop following the thread.
Amazing! Even when I point out people deflecting from the failures of Brexit, they just add more verbiage around their deflection. At least these people are determined.Trade deals and commercial deals such as PFIs are primarily negotiated by civil servants. They obviously have to work with Government ministers, but the vast majority of the work is done by civil servants. Its a full time job. Ministers will sign deals off and maybe discuss some key aspects of the deals but they can't work 40 hours a week on trade deals. If Ministers take 100% credit for trade deals they are not been sincere (surprise, surprise).
Its commonly accepted that the PFIs deals of the 1990s and 2000s were better deals for the private sector providers than the Public sector customers. The civil servants were under pressure by the Labour Government to get new schools and hospitals etc built and in general they didn't have the expertise to negotiate on a equal level with private finance and construction companies (that are profit driven). The Labour Government did not want to borrow to pay for most of its public infrastructure projects. Its a bit like people today buying flash new cars on lease deals. You get a nice new car now and appear to pay little up front, but in the long run it can be an expensive option.
Going back to international trade deals - how many trade deal expert negotiators does the UK civil service have?
What a massive hypocrite you are...He won’t do that because he’d rather attack insult and deflect.