Attacking the South Stand ..

[Rauko]

It isn't always our choice? The away team may win the toss and recognise the South is the noisy end and want us shooting towards the North in the second, not the South?

We come out of the tunnel and take up position BEFORE the coin toss with the intention of attacking the South Stand first half .. but the opposite should also be true if there's something in your theory .. if WE win the toss why not "recognise the South is the noise end want to shoot towards it in the second half"

No, the team comes out, set up to attack the South Stand in the first half before the kick off and goes with the status quo regardless of coin toss (think this season they've changed ends once after the toss)

 

[Priv]

Does anyone really care which side we attack second half, Id suggest anyone getting their knickers in a twist over this, gives them a good wring out and starts wearing panty liners ffs.

Though Id hazard a guess that fan behaviour is the key reason it hasnt been changed or isnt rotated.

 

[joeychicago]

Never feels right when we attack the North first half. Should keep it as it's always been and attack the North 2nd half

 

[TeaCider]

I don't think it really matters, but I like us playing towards the North stand in the second half.

The only time I think there's a genuine impact is when it's very windy or there's blinding sunshine in one goal at kick-off.

 

[Humpty]

It's bizarre that we don't attack our most vocal and partisan end in the 2nd half when we're looking to close out a game for the win.

 

[joeychicago]

Attacking the North, at least there's a bowl of continuous Boro fans. That corner towards the away end is empty almost every single week.