Well Id save that assessment until after tonights game BG. This is the first great team we will have played this tournament. Lets see how we cope before bestowing best team of the tournament titles on teams.Even if we lose tonight I would still argue we were the best team in the competition.
Man City have been the best team in the FA Cup for the last 5 or 6 years and only won it once. That's knock out football for you. The best team doesn't always win. They are just the most likely winner. I think we would all agree Brazil are better than Croatia and Spain are better than Morocco.
Anyway, I fancy England to get it done tonight. Like I say, the experience of the last two major tournaments has to be a huge positive.
This as you say that’s the real test.This is the first great team we will have played this tournament.
Well Id save that assessment until after tonights game BG. This is the first great team we will have played this tournament. Lets see how we cope before bestowing best team of the tournament titles on teams.
World Cup yes.I agree it does but then you have to remember that France have the exactly the same experience but they actually won it.
Indeed it should be very interesting. I hope we come to the match with our A game.Likewise for France too, at least.
Should be a good game.
That French defeat in R16 in the Euros will serve them well. They were cruising 3-1 in that game until 2 late Swiss goals took it to penalties which are a lottery.Euros the most recent tournament (which most of our current squad played in) they went out in the last 16. We went all the way.
Mbappe is a class act, no doubt about it, but we have the tools to deal with him.
Maybe I'm over confident but I really think we are the best team in the competition and will win the game tonight.
Bookies odds had Joshua about 1/3 to beat Usyk in their first fight but anyone with any sort of boxing knowledge knew that Usyk was far superior.Dispassionate football traders don't think England are the best team in the competition. England are not even favourites for tonight's game 13/8 France 2/1 England. 5/1 to win the competition outright. Probably about right.
France we’re my favourites initially, but after my conversation with Neil Warnock he convinced me otherwise. I do think we”ve got a bit more than France this World Cup and rather than France being the Germany in 1990 I’m seeing other countries being our failures in years gone by.. Spain echoing our previous fragility when it comes to penalties, Brazil too.The French are missing 4 key players.
Considering that, I think we've got a stronger squad, but they've got the best player.
You are right bookies do get it wrong. They are only a reflection of probabilities. In a one of match a 10/1 chance can win.Bookies odds had Joshua about 1/3 to beat Usyk in their first fight but anyone with any sort of boxing knowledge knew that Usyk was far superior.
Bookies odds aren't always the best indicator.
My opinion anyway, England have the best squad and best first team in the competition
You're probably correct.I think if we WIN tonight then it’s definitely our biggest World Cup victory since 1966, and probably England’s biggest win since then entirely.
They use a lot of factors to dictate the odds though including betting patterns, sports analysts opinions, form etcYou are right bookies do get it wrong. They are only a reflection of probabilities. In a one of match a 10/1 chance can win.
France a probably better than England.
I’m putting Germany 1990 as it was World Cup semi final v arguably the best side in the competition ( Croatia werent in 2018) as I’d say that’s the highest World Cup Game we’ve ever played on foreign soil.Reality check. France are the biggest competition we have met in this tournament, let alone since Germany 1990. It's a great test of where this England team are at right now. Was the|Germany team of Euro 2018 the last big football nation we knocked out? and they were nowhere near where France are now.
I quoted betfair which is an open market and reflect the entire market opinion.They use a lot of factors to dictate the odds though including betting patterns, sports analysts opinions, form etc
I'll go back to that Usyk v Joshua fight. 1/3 reflects a 75% chance of winning. The second fight Joshua was 6/4 reflecting a 40% chance of winning.
There's no way boxing ability changed that much in 6 months that the probability changed that much. The bookies just got it wrong the first time. And if they fought again I would guess Joshua would be closer to 4/1.
Bookies get it wrong and they are primarily dictated by bets taken. The point using bookies odds as back up for an argument is flawed.