Middlesbrough123
Well-known member
When you debate the size clubs are it certainly puts into perspective the importance of decent structure and ownership.
You're mixing it with the Scottish dialect:I've always thought it was cannot.
Canny be doing that.
Or canny find me keys
I don't think he had much cash to spend on new players at Sunderland, which seems to be one of the factors involved.Why didn't the daft b***ds offer him a longer contract when they got promoted? Going to stoke is a sideways move at best so you'd assume he's doing it for the cash money.
Why didn't the daft b***ds offer him a longer contract when they got promoted? Going to stoke is a sideways move at best so you'd assume he's doing it for the cash money.
That’s Scottish versionI've always thought it was cannot.
Canny be doing that.
Or canny find me keys
Behave man, as much as you probably dislike em (for the record I couldn’t care less about em) Sunderland are undoubtedly a bigger club than stoke
Really Stoke we’re in the prem when sunlun weren’tBehave man, as much as you probably dislike em (for the record I couldn’t care less about em) Sunderland are undoubtedly a bigger club than stoke
Just out of interest, what factors are you using to assess Sunderland as a bigger club than Stoke?Behave man, as much as you probably dislike em (for the record I couldn’t care less about em) Sunderland are undoubtedly a bigger club than stoke
Sunderland are a massive club compared to stokeReally Stoke we’re in the prem when sunlun weren’t
Stoke have played in europe - sunlun haven’t ( was it one game)
I think they are similar sized.
They have a big white elephant stadium they gave tickets away for. Yes but remember joker so
History and title winsBehave
Ok
What criteria ???
They haven't won a title in about 100 years have they? They do have a bigger stadium than stoke though.History and title wins
Fanbase
Stadium
They are just 3 points.
So are SunderlandDon’t understand this, you’d think Sunderland are a greater project than Stoke, whom traditionally (except under Pulis) have been a lower league club.
So are Sunderland
They were in the second division when they won the cup.
They are a second tier team.
They are a second tier team.
Stoke are no great shakes either btw but I’m sick of this sunlun massive club guff.I don’t know for sure, but I’m guessing they’ve been in and around the top flight a lot longer than Stoke have? Before Pulis, I don’t remember anything about Stoke.
Having a quick Google Sunderland average over 10,000 more than stoke.They haven't won a title in about 100 years have they? They do have a bigger stadium than stoke though.
Would be interested in how their average attendances compare, I bet there won't be hugely significant difference.
Stadium size in itself is meaningless, unless you think west ham are a bigger club than Liverpool?