Jedi boro
Well-known member
No I want my politicians to be directly accountable at the ballot boxObviously you're happy with minority rule. I'm not.
The list system removed all that
No I want my politicians to be directly accountable at the ballot boxObviously you're happy with minority rule. I'm not.
Everybody already votes for the party, regardless of which candidate is representing it.No I want my politicians to be directly accountable at the ballot box
The list system removed all that
As I said, you're happy with minority rule.No I want my politicians to be directly accountable at the ballot box
The list system removed all that
That’s not true though as look at dr that stand as independents.Everybody already votes for the party, regardless of which candidate is representing it.
Do you know the protocol for those soldiers been chosen?Sad to see that in a coffin party of 10 soldiers they were all white.
You really have no choice. I remember voting for one of Blair's Babes when I lived in Aberdeen. Thick as mince. I went to one of her clinics and she had no concept of how the oil industry uses contractors.That’s not true though as look at dr that stand as independents.
Yes many do but people vote for a myriad of reasons reducing it to a a single entity choice with no bearing on who you are electing I think is dangerous.
Oooo you do like getting personal don’t you! Can’t I even like a post?Ok small town you liked the post criticising me even though it was a referendum on PR
SO answer the question which format do you prefer and why ???
Not when it’s inaccurate.Oooo you do like getting personal don’t you! Can’t I even like a post?
I love the way you get angry at me, for doing the web site equivalent of nodding an approval. Very very angry!Not when it’s inaccurate.
STV is a form or PR. That’s not up for debate.
We did not have a referendum on PR. It was a referendum on a specific and useless form of PR.
It looked extremely accurate to me. Chill out grumpy old manNot when it’s inaccurate.
STV is a form or PR. That’s not up for debate.
I suggest you look at how many old boys are Tory MPs and how many of them are given safe seats if you want to see cronyism.Absolutely it will be a cronyism charter.
You say that but, they can block any law they want and use that to manipulate whatever they want.More terrible Pms get appointed or voted in sadly. That’s the nature of our electoral system. We have had 4 in a row now. We won’t have a terrible king because he won’t have enough power to make your life a misery.
of course it is. STV can lead to a party with 10-15% of the vote getting 0.3% of seats just like today, it's not proportional just a bit more proportional than FPTP.Not when it’s inaccurate.
STV is a form or PR. That’s not up for debate.
Im not sure they have done anything which has been an affront as much as laws passed by elected politicians. The really last bad king was probably George IVYou say that but, they can block any law they want and use that to manipulate whatever they want.
Is it the same the same protocol that exempts the palace from race and discrimination laws?Do you know the protocol for those soldiers been chosen?
I'm assuming it's similar to the guards who stood watch over the coffin but not exactly the same. Those guards had to have done 22 years of service and reach warrant officer rank.
No idea.Is it the same the same protocol that exempts the palace from race and discrimination laws?
Why on earth would they want to be exempt from race and discrimination laws?No idea.
Plenty of representation by different races at the funeral mind.
I think that what has happened here is that 3.5 billion of those people turned the telly on and immediately turned it off and then turnedNot gonna lie, the idea that 4 billion people watched today has cracked me up. I think I’d struggle to believe a billion watched but 4 billion is outrageous