It will be over time. Rome wasn’t built in a day.Are we seeing any benefits from his appointment yet?
Surely his job is to find players who will improve us that we can afford then ?Can’t blame Scott if we are refusing to pay market rate for any players
No.Are we seeing any benefits from his appointment yet?
Yet they find money for players the recruitment team identified last summer.He recommends players to the club that they can't afford
If we’re paying market value for players why do we need Scot ?Can’t blame Scott if we are refusing to pay market rate for any players
Bausors remit is quite clear I think, regardless of the perception of whether he does it well or not.The prevents the "What does Neil Bauser actually do" posts.
Money well spent in my book.
The alternative is Gary GillI
Bausors remit is quite clear I think, regardless of the perception of whether he does it well or not.
I’m just genuinely not sure what Scott does or what benefits we are reaping. Or is he just around to make sure we don’t appoint a duffer when Wilder leaves?
A quick Google search should answer your question, in broad terms at least.I
Bausors remit is quite clear I think, regardless of the perception of whether he does it well or not.
I’m just genuinely not sure what Scott does or what benefits we are reaping. Or is he just around to make sure we don’t appoint a duffer when Wilder leaves?
Hoppe is his type of signing. Forss is too and Larsen if he signsI’m just struggling to see what has improved since he joined . Recruitment seems uninspired, is he in charge of this?
The foreign lads coming in haven’t been greatRecruitment actually seems worse since he joined, early days yet but I thought he would be the one to really change things