So will those that were apprehensive before now be more inclined to take it now that the lancet has confirmed it as safe.
175 in 23,000 had a severe adverse reaction, of which 3 were believed to be due to the vaccine.So will those that were apprehensive before now be more inclined to take it now that the lancet has confirmed it as safe.
Exactly an amazing result.175 in 23,000 had a severe adverse reaction, of which 3 were believed to be due to the vaccine.
It's comparable with the flu vaccine at about 2 per 25000.Exactly an amazing result.
Fantastic, this news just gets better & betterGreat breaking news!
A couple of slight mischaracterisations, perhaps. These were not serious adverse reactions they were serious adverse events (SAE's) - there's a difference. For instance some of the adverse events were totally accidental occurrences like broken limbs that just happened to occur in trial participants.175 in 23,000 had a severe adverse reaction, of which 3 were believed to be due to the vaccine.
That’s not what was said at all btw.So now anyone who has allergies shouldn’t take it. That’s about xxx millions of people !!!
Jesus, I thought this was a rigorous test regime
How can they tell the country this after the 1st day!
Confidence is waining for me
Anyone who has history of severe allergic reactions - e.g you carry an epipen for food allergies, or have history of severe reactions to the flu jab etc... It does not count if you get runny nose when the neighbours cat comes in your garden
And they are likely being over cautious with their advice until they know more. It happens all the time and is nothing to worry about
Because it’s clearly been rushed through and even the medical community are trying to defend it.That’s not what was said at all btw.
These people who both recovered and are fine had severe allergic reaction to medicine in general to the point they carry epi pens as a result so they are not just allergic reactions.
But that’s what the idiotic mantra will now be oh you can’t get it if you have allergies which simply is not true at all.
Why are people so keen to talk down this vaccine.
I don’t get it.
Because it’s clearly been rushed through and even the medical community are trying to defend it.
If it was done at the correct time and given the amount of scrutiny required then it would’ve been accepted elsewhere
Johnson just wanted some good news ahead of his no deal
He probably means it got emergency use authorisation because that would look better politically. Rather than waiting for it to be fully approved before we use it.This type of misinformation is unhelpful, frankly dangerous and for anyone believing it could be even life threatening. Canada, for example has approved it also. I understand you hate Johnson and the tories, thats fine, If you don’t trust the science, then you likely condemn more people to death than necessary and prolong the social misery we currently have.
We'd have to wait a long time as Pfizer have only applied for emergency authorisation throughout the worldHe probably means it got emergency use authorisation because that would look better politically. Rather than waiting for it to be fully approved before we use it.