What a vindictive grandmother the Queen is turning out to be.

Btw I’m a republican but I won’t call the queen as I think she has done a remarkable job given what she has lived through but it should All end after her. Is my view.
 
atypical_boro said:
That's the world the Queen has created for her family. The Kardashians have just followed suit and used more botox, and speak with a different accent.
Click to expand...
Again that’s rubbish I’m not sure what you are getting at. The queen is a constitutional position head of state not some Hollywood reality show.

the kardashian reference was aimed at meg and co exploiting themselves for tv and social media kudos.
 
As I understand it
The Major’s son and Meghan announce they are leaving the institution in a press statement despite being asked not to break cover by the father that brought him up as his own and his grandmother.
They said they want to find a way to make a life for themselves and, overnight, set up the Sussex Royal’s website.
Prior to all this they take a trip, invite the press and use it for their own gain.

Yup - the Queen is a right chunt alright :D
 
1finny said:
As I understand it
The Major’s son and Meghan announce they are leaving the institution in a press statement despite being asked not to break cover by the father that brought him up as his own and his grandmother.
They said they want to find a way to make a life for themselves and, overnight, set up the Sussex Royal’s website.
Prior to all this they take a trip, invite the press and use it for their own gain.

Yup - the Queen is a right chunt alright :D
Click to expand...
The majors son lol I like it.
Yes they are happy to play the royal card when it suits them.
 
How will Harry ever stop being the son of Prince Charles and Princess Diana? How will he expunge his military service, his work with veterans and other charities?

Society can argue all it likes about the merits of this, but title or not, simply being Harry will allow him to do things that allow him to live his life as he wishes.
 
atypical_boro said:
So would you treat your grandson like this, in her shoes?
Click to expand...
Well would you, Zorro?

I don’t know you but from your posts over the years I’d surmise that you wouldn’t. So why you (or anyone else) would defend the Queen’s behaviour is beyond me. Especially if you aren’t a dyed-in-the-wool, zombified royalist.
 
Last edited:
coluka said:
I do see your point atypical, especially when the likes of Beatrice and Eugenie are allowed to work and do their own thing and use their princess titles. Harry will always be Prince Harry I guess, the Sussex titles were presumably gifted for use on royal duties following his marriage. Whilst I don’t know, I have assumed it is all to do with the public funding and their wish not to undertake duties on behalf of the Queen, so will also not be able to use their Sussex titles officially.

I guess its just protocol rather than anything else though. Although it is probably also to stop Meghan profiting from the Royals ‘brand’ without representing them officially, which imho is fair enough i suppose.
Click to expand...

Coluka; you are right BUT at least Beatrice and Eugenie earn their own money through paid employment, they are not launching a “York Royal“ brand like the Sussexes are.
 
Good news really AT, it's the beginning of the end, she won't last much longer and Andrew has disgraced the country.
It's nearly finished now not many will wave flags and grovel at those sort it they do there something a matter with them.
 
ticker_tape said:
Good news really AT, it's the beginning of the end, she won't last much longer and Andrew has disgraced the country.
It's nearly finished now not many will wave flags and grovel at those sort it they do there something a matter with them.
Click to expand...
I think you’re wrong as we already have the new generation ready wills Kate and co nope this is going not ending any time soon
 
Criminal what Royal grovellers do to the poor b***ds, a life in captivity full of mental people. One sick nation.
 
dooderooni said:
That's not answering the question though.
Click to expand...
Here’s my answer if he hates his royal life and royal duties so much then why trademark the words Sussex royal the week before he was to leave the country.

if he gave up all his royal titles and cut all ties with the civil list and took no money from the british taxpayer then I’d respect him and his decision the fact he doesn’t says it all.
 
zorro_mfc said:
Here’s my answer if he hates his royal life and royal duties so much then why trademark the words Sussex royal the week before he was to leave the country.

if he gave up all his royal titles and cut all ties with the civil list and took no money from the british taxpayer then I’d respect him and his decision the fact he doesn’t says it all.
Click to expand...

It’s not answering the question as to whether you’d prohibit your grandchild from exploiting an income out of vindictiveness though. Does it harm her even if he does?

I suspect you wouldn’t do the same but you’re treating this as party A v party B which of course it isn’t, it’s grandmother against grandson.
 
zorro_mfc said:
Again this makes no sense as he’snot taking over the family shop.
Exploit an income - you say it yourself as yes Thats the issue and that’s why the queen has acted.
Click to expand...

And why is she prohibiting him from doing it? Does she prefer to see him to struggle?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top