Warnocks rejects - a thing of the past

If you’re good enough you’re old enough as NW showed this season. Hopefully CW will follow that trend.
 
Colin Warnek said:
If you’re good enough you’re old enough as NW showed this season. Hopefully CW will follow that trend.
Click to expand...
No he never as the fact they youngsters used that name because that’s how they felt warnocks rejects. He even chose to have an empty seat on the bench than give them a chance.

As for josh he only used him as he has no one else.
 
zorro_mfc said:
No he never as the fact they youngsters used that name because that’s how they felt warnocks rejects. He even chose to have an empty seat on the bench than give them a chance.

As for josh he only used him as he has no one else.
Click to expand...
And Isaiah Jones like.

The youngsters named their fifa team that, i’m sure others who arent picked by the manager may do so in the future for bants. It’s not as big a deal as you’re making out in my opinion. This attempt to label Warnock as a Strachan type freezing out the youngsters is tiresome.
 
Last edited:
zorro_mfc said:
No he never as the fact they youngsters used that name because that’s how they felt warnocks rejects. He even chose to have an empty seat on the bench than give them a chance.

As for josh he only used him as he has no one else.
Click to expand...
Never understood the 5-6 players on the bench either. Stick a couple of U-23s on there, great experience for them just being in and around the first team squad.
 
Colin Warnek said:
And Isaiah Jones like.

Thr youngsters named their fifa team that, i’m sure others who arent picked by the manager may do so in the future for bants. It’s not as big a deal as you’re making out in my opinion. This attempt to label Warnock as a Strachan type freezing out the youngsters is tiresome.
Click to expand...
Why it’s true

he loaned out the rest such was as his contempt.
 
Isiah jones was frozen out ore-season, and was due to go on loan. In our friendlies he shone and earned the right to stay. Now either warnock is a genius who saw jones' potential or he was blind because he couldn't instantly see jones' potential.

Pays yer money and takes yer pick. For me he would be loaning out messi cause he cant hold up the ball, head and doesn't sprint enough.
 
Laughing said:
Isiah jones was frozen out ore-season, and was due to go on loan. In our friendlies he shone and earned the right to stay. Now either warnock is a genius who saw jones' potential or he was blind because he couldn't instantly see jones' potential.

Pays yer money and takes yer pick. For me he would be loaning out messi cause he cant hold up the ball, head and doesn't sprint enough.
Click to expand...
So in short he saw him play in the pre-season friendlies, the lad did well and so he decided to give him his chance in the first team. What's your point?
 
chickenrunner said:
So in short he saw him play in the pre-season friendlies, the lad did well and so he decided to give him his chance in the first team. What's your point?
Click to expand...
He should have seen it sooner, is my point. I thought that was clear. It is an example of his uninvolvement with the youngsters. His dropping of Jones, likewise.

Look Warnock was clearly divisive as far as fans were concerrned. You think he was a decent manager, I really don't. I think he didn't get anywhere enough from the players at his disposal. His favourites were untouchable, regardless of their contribution, the ones out of favour were played only when he had to play them.

I genuinely belief he was an awful manager. I get you don't agree, and that, in a nutshell is football.
 
Laughing said:
He should have seen it sooner, is my point. I thought that was clear. It is an example of his uninvolvement with the youngsters. His dropping of Jones, likewise.

Look Warnock was clearly divisive as far as fans were concerrned. You think he was a decent manager, I really don't. I think he didn't get anywhere enough from the players at his disposal. His favourites were untouchable, regardless of their contribution, the ones out of favour were played only when he had to play them.

I genuinely belief he was an awful manager. I get you don't agree, and that, in a nutshell is football.
Click to expand...
You don't 'get' anything. I'm just not interested in complete b***ks just to drive agendas and will call it out whenever I see it. Sorry.

I'm pretty neutral on the whole affair and it will be interesting to see how Wilder's tenure unfolds. Warnock has gone, move on, stop trying to score points which aren't there or tenuous in the extreme.
 
Think most managers have their favourites, Warnock was no different. But bringing the likes of Peltier in, rather than looking at a genuine LB for example was massively short sighted. Starting the season with only one genuine CF. 🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️. I definitely wouldn't say he was awful, that's very harsh imo, but performances and standard of football also contributed towards his early exit. Anyhow, all done now. Look to the future with the new set up👍
 
h_m_boro said:
Never understood the 5-6 players on the bench either. Stick a couple of U-23s on there, great experience for them just being in and around the first team squad.
Click to expand...
Like I've explained till I'm blue in the face....
The U23's play on Sunday. What's the point of putting one on the bench when they would get much more out of playing the next day. Warnock said he wouldn't have used them anyway so what's the point.
He normally had a couple of U23's on the bench anyway Koloko, Coburn Hackney etc.
 
chickenrunner said:
You don't 'get' anything. I'm just not interested in complete b***ks just to drive agendas and will call it out whenever I see it. Sorry.

I'm pretty neutral on the whole affair and it will be interesting to see how Wilder's tenure unfolds. Warnock has gone, move on, stop trying to score points which aren't there or tenuous in the extreme.
Click to expand...
OH dear, and what do you think my agenda is, beyond a discussion on the relative opinions on our departing manager, of couse? I have no agenda, and to say I am talking b***ks isn't really necessary.
 
Nobby_Barnes said:
Like I've explained till I'm blue in the face....
The U23's play on Sunday. What's the point of putting one on the bench when they would get much more out of playing the next day. Warnock said he wouldn't have used them anyway so what's the point.
He normally had a couple of U23's on the bench anyway Koloko, Coburn Hackney etc.
Click to expand...
Like I said.......rather than have 5 on the bench, give them an opportunity to sample the first team matchday preparation etc. Doesn't have to play them, nothing to lose has he?
 
h_m_boro said:
Like I said.......rather than have 5 on the bench, give them an opportunity to sample the first team matchday preparation etc. Doesn't have to play them, nothing to lose has he?
Click to expand...
Not just not play either as they didn’t even travel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top