US Subcommittee UAP / UFO Hearing
- Thread starter Rauko
- Start date
Sheriff_John_Bunnell_ret
Well-known member
I think plaz got superbanned during COVID.
Lefty
Well-known member
Or did he?
ThatFragranceGuy
Well-known member
We've got funky chicken now for all our loony conspiracies
Teesside96
Active member
I’ve been following the topic for a while it’s very interesting…
Basically these 3 men are very high ranking people in the US. The hearing was about all 3 swearing under oath to the existence of UFOs, crashes and retrial programmes taken place for decades in avanues of a more secret government branching off the normal government and private military contracters.
It does sound like a lot of **** on the face of it but If you look into the the 3 guys background they are very reputable people in terms of their careers. All three with 20 years plus in the military achieving top ranks.
David Grusch is what spurred this meeting to congress in the US he came out as a whistleblower around a month ago. Basically Grusch has exposed secret programmes performing what I mentioned above. He is in a government position with a high level of clearance.
The two other gentleman have both seen a UFO in a navy training excercise in the US. Basically were 50ft away from what defies all laws of physics and had to abandon a test mission due to the object that was in their airspace. They give a detailed description of what the object looked like (basically a cube with a sphere round it) that had no propulsion but could go from 1000’s of ft to sea level in under a second. Not just from the naked eye but all the high level instruments used on the jet the pilots used also confirmed this, this arguably and to me the most credible UFO case in history
Believe what you want to and ofcourse question what they are saying. But 3 guys of this rank testifying under oath to congress about this matter is huge.
Basically these 3 men are very high ranking people in the US. The hearing was about all 3 swearing under oath to the existence of UFOs, crashes and retrial programmes taken place for decades in avanues of a more secret government branching off the normal government and private military contracters.
It does sound like a lot of **** on the face of it but If you look into the the 3 guys background they are very reputable people in terms of their careers. All three with 20 years plus in the military achieving top ranks.
David Grusch is what spurred this meeting to congress in the US he came out as a whistleblower around a month ago. Basically Grusch has exposed secret programmes performing what I mentioned above. He is in a government position with a high level of clearance.
The two other gentleman have both seen a UFO in a navy training excercise in the US. Basically were 50ft away from what defies all laws of physics and had to abandon a test mission due to the object that was in their airspace. They give a detailed description of what the object looked like (basically a cube with a sphere round it) that had no propulsion but could go from 1000’s of ft to sea level in under a second. Not just from the naked eye but all the high level instruments used on the jet the pilots used also confirmed this, this arguably and to me the most credible UFO case in history
Believe what you want to and ofcourse question what they are saying. But 3 guys of this rank testifying under oath to congress about this matter is huge.
Kevo4
Well-known member
Okay let me rephrase, what is the ultimate goal of this hearing?
To initially to get more information into the public domain, to create a pathway for others to come forward safely without fear and ultimately to bring about full disclosure.
Kevo4
Well-known member
Yeah true, in my mind I just associate ufo and aliens as one almost.
Glad to know that. Guess we can ignore the military and intelligence witnesses who provided evidence to the contrary this afternoon to congress whilst under oath. I'm sure you listened to it all before coming to your conclusion so it's good to hear that it's all rubbish.
Lefty
Well-known member
I knew this on the face of it fair point was coming. I will reserve a fraction of a per cent certainty, but I'm 99.9% certain whatever they say is not evidence of aliens visiting.
HolgateCorner
Well-known member
I don’t think so, have you seen Dr Who?
We can all sleep tonight then. Maybe we can arrange it that you're a special guest at the next congressional hearing .. you can go in .. they'll ask you questions and you can just answer each question with : "it's all rubbish" .. and they won't need the other special program witnesses, the other naval pilots, the intelligence officers or military personnel that they're trying to provide a safe environment for them to come forward into. "It's all rubbish" - so there's no point in wasting anybody else's time when they have your expert testimony. I'll send a couple of emails out if you're up for it ..
Lefty
Well-known member
So the only good evidence is all Top Secret and in America? A country that couldn't even keep a blow job in the oval office secret?
And no other good evidence anywhere even in the world?
Hasn't it puzzled you why even now, with all the huge advances in cameras and proliferation of mobile phones, that all the footage is still sh1tty grainy blurry rubbish.
You think the science community, the vast amateur astonomer community would not find something or keep quiet if they did?
And no other good evidence anywhere even in the world?
Hasn't it puzzled you why even now, with all the huge advances in cameras and proliferation of mobile phones, that all the footage is still sh1tty grainy blurry rubbish.
You think the science community, the vast amateur astonomer community would not find something or keep quiet if they did?
ThePrisoner
Well-known member
Aliens use cloaking tech so we can't see them. I know this for a fact because several times their cloaking fields have extended as far as my car keys.