Coming to you from CNN?! From within the same article (from 2019) this is about a specific member of staff who left.
"After CNN Business reached out to a representative for The Hill for comment, The Hill Editor-In-Chief Bob Cusack announced in a Monday morning email to staffers that Solomon’s work was under review.
“As you are aware, John Solomon left The Hill earlier in the fall, but in light of recent congressional testimony and related events, we wanted to apprise you of the steps we are taking regarding John Solomon’s opinion columns which were referenced in the impeachment inquiry,” Cusack wrote.
“Because of our dedication to accurate non-partisan reporting and standards, we are reviewing, updating, annotating with any denials of witnesses, and when appropriate, correcting any opinion pieces referenced during the ongoing congressional inquiry,” Cusack added.
But employees who spoke to CNN Business said the email had done little to quell internal outrage, and felt like too little too late. The employees said that they were pondering their next moves. "
Is it not possible that maybe just maybe you shouldn't write off an article because someone told you not to believe what they write because they're on the other team. Could you not read the article like I did with the CNN article and then come to your own assumptions?
www.independent.co.uk
