All free kicks are taken from the place where the offence occurred, except:The free kick was taken nowhere near where the keeper picked up the ball. He was almost on the touchline just to the right of the post. Kick taken on the 6 yard box? Is that some kind of rule, as would have been a lot harder to score from the tight angle from where he actually picked the ball up?
You learn something new every day.All free kicks are taken from the place where the offence occurred, except:
indirect free kicks to the attacking team for an offence inside the opponents’ goal area are taken from the nearest point on the goal area line which runs parallel to the goal line
The goal area is the 6 yard box so the 6 yard line is the closest to the goal an attacking indirect free kick can be taken.
The bloke on the post had his legs open anyway but, to compound the problem, he now runs forward leaving a yard gap to the post! It was the only way we could score!
So what about defending players having to be 10 yards from where a free kick is taken?All free kicks are taken from the place where the offence occurred, except:
indirect free kicks to the attacking team for an offence inside the opponents’ goal area are taken from the nearest point on the goal area line which runs parallel to the goal line
The goal area is the 6 yard box so the 6 yard line is the closest to the goal an attacking indirect free kick can be taken.
Also clearly covered in the laws.So what about defending players having to be 10 yards from where a free kick is taken?
I was expecting the ref to make sure they were all behind the goal-line, including the goalie.
Would be a bit harsh to ask the defenders to stand behind the netSo what about defending players having to be 10 yards from where a free kick is taken?
I was expecting the ref to make sure they were all behind the goal-line, including the goalie.
It's the first time I've seen one of these given in years, except for a spate of them when they brought the rule in. It was bleedingly obvious though, which makes their stand-in manager's comment about it being a brave decision look stupid.
It’s not even debatable. It’s one thing having a go at refs about genuinely contentious decisions but this is simply to pile on pressure.'I'm not a referee' Sums it all up really.
Alan Sheehan fumes at 'brave' backpass call that proved decisive for Boro
Swansea City boss Alan Sheehan was not happy with the backpass decision that led to Middlesbrough's winning goalwww.gazettelive.co.uk
He should be asking his keeper why he didn’t take any chances on the ref giving a backpass.'I'm not a referee' Sums it all up really.
Alan Sheehan fumes at 'brave' backpass call that proved decisive for Boro
Swansea City boss Alan Sheehan was not happy with the backpass decision that led to Middlesbrough's winning goalwww.gazettelive.co.uk
Some knowledge that!All free kicks are taken from the place where the offence occurred, except:
indirect free kicks to the attacking team for an offence inside the opponents’ goal area are taken from the nearest point on the goal area line which runs parallel to the goal line
The goal area is the 6 yard box so the 6 yard line is the closest to the goal an attacking indirect free kick can be taken.
In his logic the fact his keeper picked it up proved it wasn't a backpass! Because obviously all footballers are completely infallible and never make errors of judgement.He should be asking his keeper why he didn’t take any chances on the ref giving a backpass.
It was definitely a brave decision to give it thought because that ref will now be hauled over the coals by the refs club for facilitating a Boro win.. I suppose in mitigation he will be able to say he did not think we would score from it.