The winning goal.

The free kick was taken nowhere near where the keeper picked up the ball. He was almost on the touchline just to the right of the post. Kick taken on the 6 yard box? Is that some kind of rule, as would have been a lot harder to score from the tight angle from where he actually picked the ball up?
 
The free kick was taken nowhere near where the keeper picked up the ball. He was almost on the touchline just to the right of the post. Kick taken on the 6 yard box? Is that some kind of rule, as would have been a lot harder to score from the tight angle from where he actually picked the ball up?
All free kicks are taken from the place where the offence occurred, except:
indirect free kicks to the attacking team for an offence inside the opponents’ goal area are taken from the nearest point on the goal area line which runs parallel to the goal line


The goal area is the 6 yard box so the 6 yard line is the closest to the goal an attacking indirect free kick can be taken.
 
All free kicks are taken from the place where the offence occurred, except:
indirect free kicks to the attacking team for an offence inside the opponents’ goal area are taken from the nearest point on the goal area line which runs parallel to the goal line


The goal area is the 6 yard box so the 6 yard line is the closest to the goal an attacking indirect free kick can be taken.
You learn something new every day.
 
At school...
We'd have Rodgers, with his foot just in front of the ball. ( An inch gap between ball and foot )
So Silvera whacks it .. it touches Rodgers foot on its way in ( Rodgers goal )
Stops people running off the line ..
Was this even legal ?
 
All free kicks are taken from the place where the offence occurred, except:
indirect free kicks to the attacking team for an offence inside the opponents’ goal area are taken from the nearest point on the goal area line which runs parallel to the goal line


The goal area is the 6 yard box so the 6 yard line is the closest to the goal an attacking indirect free kick can be taken.
So what about defending players having to be 10 yards from where a free kick is taken?

I was expecting the ref to make sure they were all behind the goal-line, including the goalie.

It's the first time I've seen one of these given in years, except for a spate of them when they brought the rule in. It was bleedingly obvious though, which makes their stand-in manager's comment about it being a brave decision look stupid.
 
So what about defending players having to be 10 yards from where a free kick is taken?

I was expecting the ref to make sure they were all behind the goal-line, including the goalie.
Also clearly covered in the laws.

Law 13 states that at a free kick:

"Until the ball is in play, all opponents must remain:

at least 9.15 m (10 yds) from the ball, unless they are on their own goal line between the goalposts"
 
So what about defending players having to be 10 yards from where a free kick is taken?

I was expecting the ref to make sure they were all behind the goal-line, including the goalie.

It's the first time I've seen one of these given in years, except for a spate of them when they brought the rule in. It was bleedingly obvious though, which makes their stand-in manager's comment about it being a brave decision look stupid.
Would be a bit harsh to ask the defenders to stand behind the net 🙂
 
As a tactic all the players on the goal line form a solid barrier. If they don’t move surely it‘s harder to score than if a player rushes the ball, as Swansea did, and leave a gap where the ball can be placed as we did.
 
listened to his interview after the match and he mentioned he mishit it maybe that somehow contributed to fooling the defenders either way glad it went in
 
'I'm not a referee' Sums it all up really.

It’s not even debatable. It’s one thing having a go at refs about genuinely contentious decisions but this is simply to pile on pressure.

It’s like your player kicking it out for a corner, then saying the ref made a big call for giving a corner. It’s not on really, he should be asked to explain his comments.
 
'I'm not a referee' Sums it all up really.

He should be asking his keeper why he didn’t take any chances on the ref giving a backpass.

It was definitely a brave decision to give it thought because that ref will now be hauled over the coals by the refs club for facilitating a Boro win.. I suppose in mitigation he will be able to say he did not think we would score from it.
 
All free kicks are taken from the place where the offence occurred, except:
indirect free kicks to the attacking team for an offence inside the opponents’ goal area are taken from the nearest point on the goal area line which runs parallel to the goal line


The goal area is the 6 yard box so the 6 yard line is the closest to the goal an attacking indirect free kick can be taken.
Some knowledge that!
 
What I couldnt understand was why he (ref) accepted players having one foot on the line as being far enough away from the ball, even though the had their other foot ahead of the line - As it was this probably helped the Boro as this was where the gap came from that the ball went through.

Lee Trundle was like me, also wondering why the tiny tap was allowed - but fair play to the Swansea commentry team - they looked up the rule and admitted they didn't know the rule had changed. Do you think the Boro players knew anything about the rule / rule change?
 
He should be asking his keeper why he didn’t take any chances on the ref giving a backpass.

It was definitely a brave decision to give it thought because that ref will now be hauled over the coals by the refs club for facilitating a Boro win.. I suppose in mitigation he will be able to say he did not think we would score from it.
In his logic the fact his keeper picked it up proved it wasn't a backpass! Because obviously all footballers are completely infallible and never make errors of judgement.

Embarrassing comments really. Nice to have a manager for once who doesn't throw his toys out the pram and act like a child when things don't go his way.
 
Back
Top