The thread was about the Swedish Approach. You brought up Spain and Italy, not me. So maybe you should give Cleese and Co a watch.
Sweden appears to have adopted lockdown by consent but it's doing very poorly compared with countries that locked down earlier and in a mandatory way. Their protection of the vulnerable has been a disgrace with visitors to care homes only stopped at the beginning of April. Hopefully those responsible are held accountable.I wasn't suggesting that at all but you know, it hasn't worked out that well in Spain and Italy has it. Six weeks of children under house arrest and still many more people dying every day than in Sweden (where it has, largely been in the capital city so far). You look at the Sagrada Familia webcam in the webcam thread and you see fairly cramped apartment living. If you lock just one infected person into those blocks, it's like a ship, it will spread throughout (especially as it now seems that it can be airborne and travelling around centralised air con systems). Lockdown seems such a great idea, so simple ... but maybe, and we will only find out later, it wasn't that great at all. And both countries still have to come out of lockdown yet.
Sweden appears to have adopted lockdown by consent but it's doing very poorly compared with countries that locked down earlier and in a mandatory way. Their protection of the vulnerable has been a disgrace with visitors to care homes only stopped at the beginning of April. Hopefully those responsible are held accountable.
Foreign Secretary Ann Linde admitting one area that has failed and the high death toll wasn't planned.Not sure what measures you are using to compare. They concede that they didn't act early enough on care homes as far as I'm aware, and they had similar issues to the UK in sourcing sufficient PPE. But you are aprtially right about "by consent" ... but it's the same here to a large extent as the police are unwilling/unable to enforce the rather vague rules. Their approach isn't radically different to ours. The two main things that stick out to me are 1, they kept schools open for kids up to 14 I think (maybe older). And 2. They have allowed businesses, bars etc to keep functioning but with social distancing rules.
I think a failure to protect the elderly and vulnerable is common to quite a few countries (UK, Spain, Italy), but it may be, in the end, that it's impossible to do in the longer term.
Foreign Secretary Ann Linde admitting one area that has failed and the high death toll wasn't planned.
Lockdown by rules and guidelines that must be followed
I think its pointless comparing whats happening in Sweden and a Population of just over 10 million spread over 450,295 square Km with the UK with a population of over 66 million spread over 242,495 square Km.
Why not compare Sweden and 18,926 cases with New Zealand who have been on lock down and only had 1122 cases with a population of nearly 5 million spread over 268,000 square Km. That makes Swedens decision look totally wrong.
Comparisons need to be like for like or they are pretty pointless.
Who needs a law when you have access to a tonne of chicken manure?Tomorrow night is traditionally a big party night all over Sweden ... Walpurgis Night
The city of Lund has come up with a fairly radical approach to keeping crowds out of their park.
"
The city park in Lund is blocked off and monitored by police drones so that tens of thousands of students will not be able to have their traditional Walpurgis party.
In addition, a ton of chicken manure is spread out.
In the City Park in Lund, every Walpurgis evening in the evening, crowds of people gather for a spontaneous party. But during the current corona pandemic, it is considered inappropriate and the park has been blocked off.
The municipality is now taking the next step to make the park even more inhospitable. A ton of chicken manure is to be spread on the lawns"
50% of Swedish deaths are from care homes. It's a perfect storm for infection. A group of people trapped in a care home. And the only people who can come into the home are those with a very high risk of infection either because they work in other homes, or in the case of nursing staff they work in hospitals dealing with Covid-19. The same is true in the UK (intimated by Raab this am), in Canada and in the US and I'm sure many others.
The US is an interesting crucible for approaches because they have 50 state organisations each with a different approach. So in New York, care homes are a disaster, and in Florida the governor (or rather his advisers) managed to protect care home residents so they've had much better protection. Perhaps because in Florida so many of the population are retired people over 60 they've had better care.
Comparison of death rates only makes sense when the pandemic is over and we get back to whatever is the new normal. Until then a variety of measures mean there will be some kind of quarantine or lock down in place in any country without herd immunity until a vaccine is developed. Only when a country completes its vaccination program will the comparisons be of value. By which time it's possible even the Norways of this world will have similar death rates to Sweden. It's probably more about how long you can afford to have your economy take time off. In Norway's case that's probably a few years. No so sure about Denmark.
Who needs a law when you have access to a tonne of chicken manure?
I heard an expert in this field suggesting that larger care homes are a big part of the problem, and that care homes should have a maximum size of 10 residents. There is a care home near me with 143 residents and 50 staff infected, and so far 34 deaths. In total of the 731 cases in the area, 664 are from care homes or health care workers. The government here is totally transparent about their public health data. It's a couple of days out of date but they tell you that up front.They also have much smaller care homes for the elderly, so protecting them is easier.
I heard an expert in this field suggesting that larger care homes are a big part of the problem, and that care homes should have a maximum size of 10 residents. There is a care home near me with 143 residents and 50 staff infected, and so far 34 deaths. In total of the 731 cases in the area, 664 are from care homes or health care workers. The government here is totally transparent about their public health data. It's a couple of days out of date but they tell you that up front.
I'm sure I read an article the other week that basically compared care homes to cruise liners, for example the constant close proximity to other residents in the home and also the higher risk of outside infection due to deliveries.
Anyone still defending lockdown...
More 'excess' (horrible term) people are dying due to non covid related death than covid undeniably now.
The economy is in tatters and it's not even helping stop the spread.
That's before we even look at the impending big brother creep across the western world.