Smoggle
Well-known member
Ok, I'm going to have to backtrack on the anti semitic bit as that looks like it was part of a stitch up job which lead to Navalny being dropped by Amnesty as a prisoner of consionse a few years back - the stitch up being misinformation lead by RT
But regarding extreme views this article leads it all out in detail. I buy that its written from a Ukrainian perspective but it does lay it out in a way that identifies a pattern.
![]()
Kate Tsurkan: The problem with lionizing Navalny and snubbing Zelensky at Oscars
When “Navalny” won the Oscar for best documentary film at the Oscars on March 12, Ukrainians worldwide were noticeably outraged at what they saw as blatant hypocrisy on the part of the Academy, given that President Volodymyr Zelensky’s request tokyivindependent.com
Much appreciated for the the reply but I’m going to disagree that there’s much detail, most of that article has little to do with Navalny and the views he actually holds, in fact it adds caveats that he’s changed some of his previous statements and he’s in favour of Ukrainian territorial integrity. I’m not sure I get the Belarus point the author is making as Belarus is absolutely a part of the war - this author seems so anti Russian that it’s clouding some of the sensible points they try to make.
Much of the last half of it is little to do with him directly at all and any political figure in Russia is likely to have made nationalist statements, it’s unpalatable but not extreme at all by Russian standards. He may well be an awful person, he might be dangerous, but I’ve still not seen anything convincing.