True indeed. I remember (a long time ago) my history A level, where the phrase ‘status quo ante bellum’ was frequently used.Wars are often lost long before they end. Politicians and leaders have always shown a disregard for the lives and well being of soldiers and civilians.
The suffering of the innocent is the true price of war.
Wars are often lost long before they end. Politicians and leaders have always shown a disregard for the lives and well being of soldiers and civilians.
The suffering of the innocent is the true price of war.
It has been a diary of The End of Eastern Europe as we've known it for the last 25 years.A point that has been made a few times. You will note that there was a question mark.
I do think that the dissent shown by the politicians who censured Putin was something of a watershed moment. At the time we didn't know that Putin was in decline personally or politically.
The situation, both on the battlefield and in Moscow, looks very different now from the way it looked in early September.
Yea, if the war stays as it is I can see this dragging on for the rest of the year atleast.It has been a diary of The End of Eastern Europe as we've known it for the last 25 years.
I think we're either in for another year followed by total Russian collapse (we don't want them pushed to the brink really, and who knows what will occupy the power vacuum created by that), or a sudden Ukraine break through on newly dried out ground, followed by a Russian stampede to the negotiating table. I don't see a third outcome myself.
I followed this lad when he was fighting ISIS in Syria and he popped up again in the 131 Seperate Recon Brigade in Ukraine and this is what he had to say about South Kherson this week which ties in with the aboveNot 100% sure I should post this, but ...
"The ongoing storming of Hola Prystan and the attack on Oleshky that just begun answers quite definitely the question of who is in control of the Islands in the Stream.
Without control it is just not possible to do amphibeous assaults and bridging operations across the Dnipro.
It also seems like the Russians have made a huge strategic error with tactical implications.
It seems like they have removed to much troops from Kherson into the attacks at Zhaporizhzhia and in Vuhledar.
The level of stupidity at comman level is incredible, after weeks of Ukrainian artillery missions and special operations attacks it is hilarious that they removed the soldiers.
Either the commander is a kretin, or he really wanted to loose as badly as possible.
The units involved says that this is seriously intended.
It is the Force Recon Brigade, 46th International Brigade & the Azov Brigade that is doing the assault together with naval units.
Behind them are two tank brigades, and they are supported by 4 artillery brigades now.
In other words, two divisions worth committed is telling of Ukraine doing at least a very strong effort into grabbing two good bridgeheads.
As I went through the maps once more I noticed that these are the only two places with good access to roads and that they would be good logistics hub for a push towards Crimea.
I honestly do not understand how Russia could leave the back door open to Crimea like this...
I know that Russians are bad at crossing rivers, and it seems like they just assumed that Ukraine could not do what they can't, even though Ukraine has proven that they are very good at bridging rivers.
Anyway, it is early days, and Ukraine are not talking about what is happening, I had to cheat to get the info.
Heck, they have not even declared that they had taken the islands.
I hope this works so that they do not have to try again later, even with few Russians holding the beaches this will have been costly to the extreme for Ukraine.
I positively hate amphibeous assaults."
I followed this lad when he was fighting ISIS in Syria and he popped up again in the 131 Seperate Recon Brigade in Ukraine and this is what he had to say about South Kherson this week which ties in with the above
Being cynical, I don't think the western support will waiver......due to the carrot being dangled at the end of the war.I think there is a real risk that western support will waiver if this war goes on long enough, which is what Putin is looking for.
We know the economic impact it is having and we could soon get to the point of countries compromising their own security if they continue to supply military equipment.
The Republican Party in America has a different view on American support and NATO member Turkey is reportedly supplying hardware to Russia, along with China.
It’s not to hard to see splits being fashioned.
You could be right.Being cynical, I don't think the western support will waiver......due to the carrot being dangled at the end of the war.
The rebuilding of Ukraine will be worth $$$$$ billions. Russia sliding into a kind of lawless gangster run state (where $$$ rules) will be very appealing to capitalist vultures swooping in to make their dirty money.
And then there are the monies being made from the arms companies - longer the war, more military hardware needed, profits shoot up. Like the old saying goes, economy struggling - start a war.
Sadly, once the war is finished, $$$$$ will be the driving force not the rebuilding of Ukraine for humanitarian/ social reasons. Neoliberalism runs rife. On steroids.
Just my cynical opinion which I hope turns out to be total bollox.
That's scary, from that position even a lower range missile that the Russian Subs carry could hit pretty much any capital in Europe.Just hearing from him, Russian sub detected outside Gothenburg.
Pinged by a Swedish sub with open torpedo tubes.
Russian sub with missile hatches open.
Patriot systems armed.
Innit great how this **** goes on without us having an inkling!