Couldn't agree more we look a real soft touch and thats the ultimate insult to NW.I think the elephant in the room is the style of play this season, verses the style when NW first arrived.
His typical set up is getting the ball forward quickly, into the channels, winning the second balls and pretty much not playing the slower, more patient approach that we seem to have moved more towards this season.
The fact is we don't look like a Warnock team and consequently don't know what we are.
that's the team I was going to say HeineIf we're gonna play hoofball we need two up front.
4-4-2
.................Lumley
Pelts ..Fry..... McNair ....Bola
Tav... Crooks.. Howson.....Jones
............Uche.... Sporar
Who will Lumley hoof the ball 75 yards to on the right wing if Crooks is in front of the back four?We’ve been overrun in midfield in pretty much every game, even at forest. We need somebody in the middle to do the dirty stuff which we’re missing. I’d play Crooks in that role. I think if we do that then it will take the pressure off central defence. I’d go 2 up top aswell as I think uche and sporar could be effective together.
lumley
peltier - McNair - fry - bola
Tav/Hernandez - crooks - howson - jones
Uche - sporar
don’t mind Lumley. Distribution not bad and at fault for hardly any goals this season. Kept the score line respectable at ReadingWho will Lumley hoof the ball 75 yards to on the right wing if Crooks is in front of the back four?
Robert and Stu sound ScottishDave
John
Bob
Mick
Trevor
Arthur
Pete
Stu
Robert
James
Paul
good English names not a Johnny Foreigner among em
If we're gonna play hoofball we need two up front.
4-4-2
.................Lumley
Pelts ..Fry..... McNair ....Bola
Tav... Crooks.. Howson.....Jones
............Uche.... Sporar