Simon Clarke MP

[Lefty]

How do message boards have cliques? Infact wouldn't every member of a message be a member of the same clique if we are using clique entry rules?

Do not confuse The Clique with The Cell. And do not, whatever you do, even mention The Inner Circle. No-one on the outside knows if this is a subset of The Elite or if the The Elite is a subset of the Inner Circle.

For reference, I am not a member of the Coterie, although I suppose I would have to say that if I were.

 

[Lefty]

And while you piled in with your smart **** remarks you took no time to consider that I might have dyslexia

Is this true, do you have sexdaily?

 

[Cooper671]

Actually I do. The Mrs is very demanding

 

[Lefty]

Actually I do. The Mrs is very demanding

I know

 

[BoroFur]

Malaguena - Based on them points I still don't understand how you could not understand it? So what if there is not a comma, are you unable to read without one and just continue without breath?

Why have you not pulled anyone else for their spelling or grammar or does that not fit your narrative?

And while you piled in with your smart **** remarks you took no time to consider that I might be dyslexic and that perfect punctuation on a message board posting of my mobile is not my top priority.

I might be dyslexic
I might be vulnerable
I might work flexi-time

There's a pattern developing here.

 

[Lefty]

Don't forget 'I might be a cuckold'

 

[Lemmy_kilmister]

Well this started out being an observation about something I saw on the telly.

Now it's turned into a seven page attention seeking contest.
New board or old board, some things/people will never change.

 

[Cooper671]

I might be dyslexic
I might be vulnerable
I might work flexi-time

There's a pattern developing here.

Yeah the only pattern is you misrepresenting my comments again

I said I work flexi (not I might)
Don’t know where you got the I might be vulnerable comment from I presume that’s totally made up

 

[BoroFur]

Yeah the only pattern is you misrepresenting my comments again

I said I work flexi (not I might)
Don’t know where you got the I might be vulnerable comment from I presume that’s totally made up

Apologies Cooper you're right, it was Priti Patel who you claimed might be vulnerable

 

[Billy Horner]

Not this again. Like I have pointed out to you and others on this thread who use this "but Corbyn" phrase. I haven't used it so why keep saying I do. Just misrepresentation which you and some of the band of merry men continue to use. It's like you are anti misrepresentation when it involves anyone but people with your political beliefs and then it's fair game

Go on then, I don't usually bite but, as it was me that used the "but Corbyn" phrase.

In a thread which discussed whether Boris Johnson had made an ill-judged remark about ventilators:

Obviously again no quotes or link to him saying it. Similar to the no link of Corbyn saying he won't self isolate which seems to be suggestion if there is no link then it didn't happen

In a thread discussing the bullying allegations against Priti Patel:

And the media is knowing for printing total truth. Least we know all them Corbyn stories weren’t sensationalised then if everything is gospel.

In a different thread discussing the bullying allegations against Priti Patel:

Your statement is basically saying you consider her a bully no matter what the outcome. Funny when the press print sensationalised stories about Corbyn they have done a hatchet job on him.

By the way, the search facility on here is great isn't it?

 

[Cooper671]

It certainly it and you have proved my point

1st story - I made reference to someone stating their was a story about Corbyn saying he wouldn’t self isolate. Point you can’t accept one story without quotes and dismiss another. It’s both or neither

2. Again pointing out that there was plenty of stories about Corbyn dismissed out of hand but accept everything printed against Patel. Again can’t be one rule for the left and another for the right

3. See above exactly the same point.

We all know the “but Corbyn” remark you and others like to make is reference to criticism of the government and supposedly stating well imagine if Corbyn was in charge etc.

I stated to show me where I have said “but Corbyn” instead what you have is found some threads in which I have used his name in line with the stories but not as a deflection as you and “the clique” suggest

But thanks for that. You have actually shown I haven’t said that.

As you were (misrepresenting)

 

[Billy Horner]

It certainly it and you have proved my point

1st story - I made reference to someone stating their was a story about Corbyn saying he wouldn’t self isolate. Point you can’t accept one story without quotes and dismiss another. It’s both or neither

2. Again pointing out that there was plenty of stories about Corbyn dismissed out of hand but accept everything printed against Patel. Again can’t be one rule for the left and another for the right

3. See above exactly the same point.

We all know the “but Corbyn” remark you and others like to make is reference to criticism of the government and supposedly stating well imagine if Corbyn was in charge etc.

I stated to show me where I have said “but Corbyn” instead what you have is found some threads in which I have used his name in line with the stories but not as a deflection as you and “the clique” suggest

But thanks for that. You have actually shown I haven’t said that.

As you were (misrepresenting)

Ok. You believe what you want to believe. The good news for the rest of us is that there's an audit trail on this site.

 

[Malaguena]

And I meant you piled in with your smart arsed remark earlier by saying can you repeat that in English.

Sorry I don’t understand that sentence even if you have the first person pronoun is implied.

“ I’ve lived in Spain to long and am out of touch”

Am? Not I am. Fair enough that’s written how someone might speak. Pretty sure that would have a red mark circled round it in some English homework

Well as I'm qualified to teach English, I can tell you that it wouldn't.

You're digging yourself into so many holes now, you're embarrassing yourself - you really ought to stop. Tell you what though - as you seem desperate to have the last word, I'll let you have it

 

[Cooper671]

What you have posted is like me searching all yours and “the cliques” posts and saying “but, but Johnson”

There’d be posts coming out my ears the amount of times Johnson gets mentioned. If it’s simply about actually mentioning said persons name and not the context the “but, but Johnson” line will be rolled out nearly ever sentence

 

[Billy Horner]

What you have posted is like me searching all yours and “the cliques” posts and saying “but, but Johnson”

There’d be posts coming out my ears the amount of times Johnson gets mentioned. If it’s simply about actually mentioning said persons name and not the context the “but, but Johnson” line will be rolled out nearly ever sentence

Go on then. The search facility is there. Find one example where I've taken a discussion about one topic and changed its focus to Johnson.