Red Faction??? Was there a boycott?

newyddion said:
But the surfers and the banners were planned. Sounds like it was multiple members that were unjustly banned.. so I’m guessing it would take a while for them to get their heads around it.. especially if they were the organisers or prominent members.

Just see how long MSF takes to release the minutes of a meeting that they were all at!
Click to expand...
I don't think it has anything to do with the minutes of MSF. Which are not typed during a meeting. They need to be correct and verified by everyone present.
How can we know if RF bannings were from.the same game?
 
Tarmodrink said:
why should they have to explain though? Surely a ban is personal/private matter
Click to expand...
That`s all well and good but the group have officially communicated that they are unjust bannings, which goes against what the club believe to be just bannings.

Right there, there is a clash of opinion that splits both sides.

We (the wider fan base) would like to understand the reason for the unjust/just bans to gauge for ourselves if these are truly unjust bans or an overly heavy handed approach by the club.

If it was truly a personal/private matter an official statement saying that the bans were unjust wouldn`t have been communicated
 
I could be way off, but could the bans be related to the incident involving going onto the side of the pitch to take a banner to the away fans that was mentioned on here a while back?

I seem to remember some chat on here about the Bristol City home match and some supporters encroaching on the side of the pitch to take a banner across to the Bristol fans? I'm sure it was a supportive/solidarity banner aimed at the managers situation, but I can definitely remember some chatter about Red Faction members taking it across and getting into bother with stewards for going on the side of the pitch. I could be misremembering though.
 
fmttmadmin said:
I don't think it has anything to do with the minutes of MSF. Which are not typed during a meeting. They need to be correct and verified by everyone present.
How can we know if RF bannings were from.the same game?
Click to expand...
the onus is is not on the victim of any wrongdoing to report on it as soon as possible although I do hope that they are able give their account of events.

MSF need to shape up.. they are responsible for giving feedback to fans in a timely manner.
 
theredrooster said:
I could be way off, but could the bans be related to the incident involving going onto the side of the pitch to take a banner to the away fans that was mentioned on here a while back?

I seem to remember some chat on here about the Bristol City home match and some supporters encroaching on the side of the pitch to take a banner across to the Bristol fans? I'm sure it was a supportive/solidarity banner aimed at the managers situation, but I can definitely remember some chatter about Red Faction members taking it across and getting into bother with stewards for going on the side of the pitch. I could be misremembering though.
Click to expand...
Ding! Ding! Ding!

Finally, after weeks of ridiculous speculation someone gets it.
 
Uwefuchs said:
Do the red faction think they are bigger than the club itself nowadays? What a bunch of babies.
Click to expand...
0_roy-keane.jpg

babies
 
boroboy6872 said:
That`s all well and good but the group have officially communicated that they are unjust bannings, which goes against what the club believe to be just bannings.

Right there, there is a clash of opinion that splits both sides.

We (the wider fan base) would like to understand the reason for the unjust/just bans to gauge for ourselves if these are truly unjust bans or an overly heavy handed approach by the club.

If it was truly a personal/private matter an official statement saying that the bans were unjust wouldn`t have been communicated
Click to expand...

Absolutely, they could garner a lot more support and understanding if they have been subjected to injustice. Most are likely to side with the club than RF in this case of not knowing. Its all strange.
 
Uwefuchs said:
Do the red faction think they are bigger than the club itself nowadays? What a bunch of babies.
Click to expand...
RF have indicated that in their opinion members have been banned unjustly.

So the question I put to you is this -

If you were banned and thought it unjust what would you do?

Accept it

Or kick up a fuss
 
boroboy6872 said:
So do many other fans inside the Riverside, like those using vapes, those taking alcoholic drinks in to the stands

You do have an axe to grind, that is perfectly clear
Click to expand...
Yep, and those people deserve to be banned too.

I don't have a particular axe to grind when it comes to RF, they've done a lot of great things for the match day atmosphere and various charities.

That doesn't merit them "special" status when it comes to the T&C's of their tickets, though.
 
Juninhoburger said:
Yep, and those people deserve to be banned too.

I don't have a particular axe to grind when it comes to RF, they've done a lot of great things for the match day atmosphere and various charities.

That doesn't merit them "special" status when it comes to the T&C's of their tickets, though.
Click to expand...
If they are getting "Special Status" surely they wouldn`t have got banned as they have stated in their statement?

Unless there is something else they are getting away with, that other fans aren`t?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top