Either they're still boycotting or the drummer must have been the one banned.
Thats what i was thinking last night, i didnt see any empty seats behind the goal, are they attending but without their flags and voices?
Nice one Awol.
The group are currently organising a Christmas Charity Fundraiser for 2 mental health charity's.Nice one Awol.
Will you be arranging for collections for local charities again for Xmas, this year?
Hope all is well at rf08 towers
Cheers palThe group are currently organising a Christmas Charity Fundraiser for 2 mental health charity's.
Detail's to follow in the coming days.
It’s a bit of an ask for them to be prepared for something that they clearly didn’t expect to happen.RF should have come out with this prior to their "boyucott" and I think more people would have, kind of, understood their rationale.
It looked like they threw their toys out of the pram over one of RF getting a 5 yr banning order for the pyro.....which now seems not to be the case. Probably bad timing all round, but they haven't covered themselves in any glory - which is a shame as I do think they do great stuff.
They put out statements re surfers, banners whatever but this time they just didn't show up - right after the 5 yr banning order was dished out.It’s a bit of an ask for them to be prepared for something that they clearly didn’t expect to happen.
I do think a bit more clarity on exactly what has happened woukd be helpful.
why should they have to explain though? Surely a ban is personal/private matterUnjust in whose eyes?
Need to explain why the banning orders were issued and why they felt them ‘unjust’
Nobody is above the ground rules - even RF.
if RF want recognition, respect or sympathy from the fans be more honest and open with details.
But the surfers and the banners were planned. Sounds like it was multiple members that were unjustly banned.. so I’m guessing it would take a while for them to get their heads around it.. especially if they were the organisers or prominent members.They put out statements re surfers, banners whatever but this time they just didn't show up - right after the 5 yr banning order was dished out.
So simply stating they were - in a display of unison with their comrades who were banned - not attending the Riverside for 3? games, I think more people would have been sympathetic towards them. As it is, their name/image whatever is a bit tarnished after the last couple of months.
Hindsight is great, I know, but I do honestly think RF do great work and hopefully everyone can move on.
To prevent it from happening again and to gain further support from the wider fan base?Genuine question - Why do they need to explain though? They’ve explained that individuals have been banned for reasons they believe they were unjust
why should they have to explain though? Surely a ban is personal/private matter