Pubs destroyed by Tories

I am not so sure about that mart. No numbers to back that up but seems anecdotally wrong. Pubs had to change their models and there weren't enough chefs around to go gastro pub. Also in lots of areas there was probably no interest in that model from customers.
There are numbers to back up that the smoking ban isn't the cause. Pubs had seen a reduction in numbers for years before the ban, and the 20 year view doesn't show any long term change in numbers of licensed pubs from the smoking ban. The trend is almost identical after 2007 as before.

The curve was downwards prior to and after the ban. There was a temporary blip of 2 years immediately after the ban where number of pubs reduced beyond the norm. BUT there was then an increase, the only increase in pub number in the last 20 years, and it was just 2 years after the smoking ban came in. This righted the trend lines. Ergo, the smoking ban is not in the slightest bit the cause for pub closures, it's about changing consumer patterns.

 
Obviously pubs have been in decline for 20-30 years now due to many reasons.

More recently, I think a lot of people definitely changed their habits during lockdown. People found other ways to socialise and other places to spend their money.

I used to love going to the pub in my late teens and right through my 20s. But now, at the age of 36, I probably enter a pub once a month for a few reasons.

I don't you can put down closure of pubs purely down to government policy. We are developing as a society where many people find other ways to fill their time other than just sitting in a pub. A lot more people out exercising these days. People tend to take more pride in their house and like to host gatherings at home. A lot of people save their money and travel more.

I love the pub. When I do go out with my mates and have a sesh, I love it. But I don't think it's bad that we as a nation are moving away from that as a sole place for socialising.
 
There are loads of things that have caused a decline.
> People drink less than they used to
> The change in licensing laws allowing places to stay open later so people don't go to pubs, they go to bars and they go out and start the night later
> Smoking ban
> Women working so more need for sharing home/parental responsibilities
> Drinking at home is cheaper
> People go out for food more so more restaurants means more competition
> Drink drive laws have been correctly tightened so you can't have a few after/during work and drive home
> People socialise less because we can communicate virtually

There aren't as many pubs now but it would be interesting to see a comparison of the number of places you can get a drink because every restaurant has a bar, hotels have a bar, every leisure activity has a bar etc
I'll add one more thing to your list, Nano - the rise of Wetherspoons has been lethal for many smaller wet-led pubs.
 
Cheap supermarket booze and all day drinking killed the traditional local boozer, along with lifestyle changes. I wouldn't get away with going to the pub as often as previous generations did, which is probably a good thing for me!
 
There are numbers to back up that the smoking ban isn't the cause. Pubs had seen a reduction in numbers for years before the ban, and the 20 year view doesn't show any long term change in numbers of licensed pubs from the smoking ban. The trend is almost identical after 2007 as before.

The curve was downwards prior to and after the ban. There was a temporary blip of 2 years immediately after the ban where number of pubs reduced beyond the norm. BUT there was then an increase, the only increase in pub number in the last 20 years, and it was just 2 years after the smoking ban came in. This righted the trend lines. Ergo, the smoking ban is not in the slightest bit the cause for pub closures, it's about changing consumer patterns.

I agree that the smoking ban had little impact on the overall trend in pub numbers, but it had a disruptive effect at the time. Quite a few 'landlocked' pubs saw a sharp trade decline and a fair number of closures. Overall, it was both a redistribution of customers and a replacement of smokers with non-smokers, but little change in the trend. On a personal note, it gave me the incentive to finally quit smoking for good!
 
There are numbers to back up that the smoking ban isn't the cause. Pubs had seen a reduction in numbers for years before the ban, and the 20 year view doesn't show any long term change in numbers of licensed pubs from the smoking ban. The trend is almost identical after 2007 as before.

The curve was downwards prior to and after the ban. There was a temporary blip of 2 years immediately after the ban where number of pubs reduced beyond the norm. BUT there was then an increase, the only increase in pub number in the last 20 years, and it was just 2 years after the smoking ban came in. This righted the trend lines. Ergo, the smoking ban is not in the slightest bit the cause for pub closures, it's about changing consumer patterns.

Cheers for that mart. Had a quick look, I do love visual aids. Anyway, can't do it now but I think we are gonna have a fight here. At first blush I think you might be wrong. I think you are saying after 2007 the numbers recovered to digest the smoking ban had no influence. What I would agree with is the decline has been going on for a long time.

Bare in mind I said the smoking ban effected your local.
 
At first blush I think you might be wrong. I think you are saying after 2007 the numbers recovered to digest the smoking ban had no influence.
The trend before and after the ban was exactly the same.

Yes there was an immediate impact, but there was a recovery also, back to the norm.

Bare in mind I said the smoking ban effected your local.
Yes, the impact on different sub-sectors of the industry will have been different, and for every local that suffered, a country pub increased trade. It levelled out within 3 years, back onto the continuous downward trend it's been on for 30 years.
 
The trend before and after the ban was exactly the same.

Yes there was an immediate impact, but there was a recovery also, back to the norm.


Yes, the impact on different sub-sectors of the industry will have been different, and for every local that suffered, a country pub increased trade. It levelled out within 3 years, back onto the continuous downward trend it's been on for 30 years.
Or for every local that shut a chain opened in a center?
 
What happened in 2010 that encourage more pubs to open?
Was there a change in taxation laws when tories took power?
Late drinking licensing law had already been brought in by this point hadn't it?
 
Those things had an effect Randy but pubs have been in decline for some time. The smoking ban didn't help your local
Also correct.

My point is we can't blame the decline of pubs just on the Tories.

The taxes on beers, ciders and spirits certainly doesn't help matters. I'd wager over 85% of pubs in this country now offer food as a way of getting punters in.
 
Also correct.

My point is we can't blame the decline of pubs just on the Tories.

The taxes on beers, ciders and spirits certainly doesn't help matters. I'd wager over 85% of pubs in this country now offer food as a way of getting punters in.
we don't owe pubs a living though, they have to cater for their market, and if they want food so be it.
 
we don't owe pubs a living though, they have to cater for their market, and if they want food so be it.
Nobody said they did.
I'm saying the taxes on beers etc are playing their part in the decline if pure wet led establishments. Also brewery rents are a concern too. Luckily the new place I work at is a freehold so we've got a bit of freedom with regards to alcohol choices.
 
I agree that the smoking ban had little impact on the overall trend in pub numbers, but it had a disruptive effect at the time. Quite a few 'landlocked' pubs saw a sharp trade decline and a fair number of closures. Overall, it was both a redistribution of customers and a replacement of smokers with non-smokers, but little change in the trend. On a personal note, it gave me the incentive to finally quit smoking for good!
Likewise for me.After many dozens of attempts to quit ! finally managed it 6 months before the ban came in!
 
If you own a pub you can still make money, depending on the pub and you ISP but, in my experience from being a tied landlord/Manager who ran/managed pubs 20 years ago, it is now hard to make a decent living as the breweries sussed out the food offer and ruined that and also installed electronic tills. Soon as they did, best to get out of that game. Now even big chains are struggling, despite screwing down every possible penny due to taxes and energy requirement.
 
maybe, but chains is a separate issue to smoking bans.
Maybe Mart, or maybe t here was a rise in chains as they filled the gap left by local boozers who shut. I was working late last night so haven't had a chance to look at this. I am not even sure there will be pub demographic data available.

As John saays above, energy prices may well send more of them to the wall. It's a shame, I like a proper pub. We are lucky enough in our village to have 3 pubs and a social club. Having said that 10 years ago we had 7 pubs.
 
Back
Top