Alzi
Well-known member
Can imagine some heated discussions between Bausor and the WBA top brass but ultimately one of us is going to have to lose out and keep him.Will WBA want him back to weaken us.. as we're both pushing for playoffs..
Can imagine some heated discussions between Bausor and the WBA top brass but ultimately one of us is going to have to lose out and keep him.Will WBA want him back to weaken us.. as we're both pushing for playoffs..
Agree mowatt and howson has never worked as a pairingMowatt looked quality when he came on but I wouldn’t underestimate the contribution of Hackney to that.
Hackney seems to be one of those rare players who lifts the game of those around him.
If it had been cleared first time, we wouldn't have had to defend it. It is a blot on an otherwise improved performance.I think Fry and Smith had plenty to do with it. We should defend the throw and cross too
I think it’s a season long loan plus wasn’t he offloaded with a view to selling ?Will WBA want him back to weaken us.. as we're both pushing for playoffs..
Bruce certainly thought they had more than enough cover in that area... would Carlos think he has something they could use...I think it’s a season long loan plus wasn’t he offloaded with a view to selling ?
Hear what you're saying ,but a bit earlier he checked back before passing to Hackney - whose pass to Giles helped set up the goal. If we blame him for the goal conceded when 3 more things happened afterwards (throw cross finish) before it hit the net then the same should apply to the 2nd goal we scoredDid well but has a tendency to check back inside instead of thinking forward first, and that is what ultimately lead to the goal.
He had a easy forward pass to Watmore, took an extra touch, checked back inside and then ran himself into trouble and kicked it into touch where the subsequent goal came from.
Thankfully that came at 3 up because if that had came at nil nil the comments on this thread would not have been so effusive.