The point in the documentary was that Harry and Meghan were told that Archie will never be given the status of Prince even when Charles is king. That is where the issue arises here. Now why would they do that?
Was saying this to the wife earlier, absolutely no way is he Charles’ son, and it comes across like they know it. It would certainly explain a lot.
Bit different to being at home with his wife and kid(s), no?
that's your argument? He should sit at home, with no help and wait for his family to be attacked, killed or kidnapped, because he was once a soldier. Are you saying soldiers deserve to be terrorised because they enlisted? That any soldier that gets attacked or has their family attacked after serviing 'had it coming'? I'm really confused by your message here and I think you are too.
Funny that. The Daily Express are probably asking that same question. Some notable people were invited with very tenuous connections to the couple. Idris Elba for example had never met either of them. Marcus Mumford another. Or perhaps George Clooney? Oprah apparently knew MM’s mum so as good a reason as any of the other “a listers” to get an invitation I would have thought. It’s scrambling for a stick to beat her with I find strange - not why Oprah got an invite to the wedding.
That is part of the plan for a slimmed down monarchy, those plans have been in the works for years, well before Harry ever even met Meghan. Nothing at all to do with Archie's skin colour.
peace
Watching leeds get beat its better than this drivel thoughJust found out via twitter Unforgotten has been bumped for this drivel tonight. F*ck you ITV
I guess I'll have to watch the Leeds game.
Because he doesn't have a squad of troops and sit in an armoured car with a gun at hand in his home home, jeesus christ, is it really that hard?
www.independent.co.uk
but that slimmed down monarchy would have included protecting him if he had stayed, that's the reality.
Yes, for those born into it, they had no choice and its slim pickings compared to what we give them, what they are gifted, steal and con from the state.
I think he explained that they had death threats and the daily mail printed his whereabouts in Canada- he had no security at that pony so was a bit of a sitting duck. Hence moved to LA and started to earn money to pay for his and his families protection - I’m sure most would do what they can with the resources they have to protect themselves and their family.
ah fat cat you beat me to it by 3 minsI see Piers Morgan stormed offset when his co-star gave him a few home truths about his obsession with Meghan Markle.
Piers Morgan storms off GMB as Alex Beresford calls his behaviour ‘diabolical’
Beresford described Morgan’s behaviour as ‘pathetic’ and ‘diabolical’
Yet it isn't good enough for some people around here. He's looked after his family, and taken control of his own life and financial affairs for the first time in his life. Yet some people are so poisoned against anyone that dare stand up to royalty that his behaviour in protecting himself, his wife and kid is wrong? His standing on his own two feet financially is wrong? He's using his popularity to pay for his families future, but they want him flipping burgers which wouldn't pay for a gun and bullet proof car for himself let alone a 24x7 security detail.
Behave yourself FatCat, they had about as much intention of settling in Canada as the vast majority of us on here, it was always going to be the fame and fortune to be found in the US that certainly Meghan would never have had as a two bob actress on ”Suits”.
