Mask wearing post pandemic

Will you still wear one?

  • Yes

    Votes: 94 62.7%

  • No

    Votes: 56 37.3%
  • Total voters
    150
SmallTown said:
They seemed so far fetched I thought you were joking. So here goes

4th Babies are being robbed of vital early sensory developments offered by actual, normal life.
How? There is no need for their parents to wear a mask in their own home, which is were pretty much where 95% of their development comes from. Likewise outside. I'm not sure how much developmental action happens to babies safely in a buggy in a store or on public transport. I doubt they will even see masks.
5th Children with anxiety, fear and panic attacks from mask wearing.
They don't have to wear masks. IN their own home and in open air they won't be wearing masks at all. The exposure children have to mask wearing will be minimal
6th Teenagers who can no longer bond and learn about social interaction at a critical life point.
How so? How do adults wearings masks stop this in any way?
Click to expand...
"wearing"

You are so far away from understanding this that I'll happily concede.

I must admit that the suggestion of you being in character does have merit.
 
Andy_W said:
Excellent line 👏 👏

Especially when Chris Whitty the Chief Medical Officer, and Patrick Vallance the chief scientific advisor, are saying they will wear masks in certain settings, even though not legally required too. I kind of think they have a bit more morals, care and quality about them than BJ.

Although in some ways I think BJ's largely only saying what he says to appease the selfish, as he needs their votes, and if they didn't have them then they probably wouldn't have still been in power, or "got Brexit done". He's fishing basically and has seemingly got a good haul 🎣🎣
Click to expand...
They both could have set an example by wearing them during the TV briefings with them taking place in poorly ventilated rooms.
 
The thing is when Chris Whitty the Chief Medical Officer, and Patrick Vallance the chief scientific advisor, are saying they will wear masks in certain settings, even though not legally required too, then it is probably a good idea to do as they do. I kind of think they have a bit more morals, care and quality about them than BJ.

Although in some ways I think BJ's largely only saying what he says to appease the selfish, as he needs their votes, and if they didn't have them then they probably wouldn't have still been in power, or "got Brexit done". He's fishing basically and has seemingly got a good haul 🎣🎣
 
Randy said:
They both could have set an example by wearing them during the TV briefings with them taking place in poorly ventilated rooms.
Click to expand...
They get tested at least twice a week, and have been double vaccinated, and I don't see many 70+ unvaccinated people shopping or on public transport stood next to them at the briefings? Do you?

I would also be amazed if the rooms are not air-conditioned, or at least having good ventilation or having the CO2 levels monitored.

Try not to apply false equivalence, as it undermines what points you do have, even if they are limited against the counter to your argument.
 
Last edited:
Randy said:
Definitely something strange going on in the world of twitter after the announcement about certain restrictions coming to an end. Do I.T. savvy folks know how easy or difficult it is to set up multiple twitter accounts numbering in the thousands?

View attachment 20900
Click to expand...
This happens all the time. When mentally ill people like Mike Yeadon put out a video there sre about 100 accounts all post the same thing to get it in circulation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top