I only know what I have read and that is nowhere near enough to be sure on anything. I think we have a classic situation where it is feasible for an innocent person to be found guilty. However, that doesn’t mean she is innocent.
We have lots of baby deaths, parents understandably wanting answers and to hold someone, in some cases maybe anyone, accountable for their individual tragedies.
A hospital whose managers will want to point the finger of guilt anywhere but on their running of the hospitals in question including any inadequate policies procedures and personal culpability.
We have a media focussing on directing the attention toward a chosen narrative that has flaws.
Specialists that fit the situation to a theory rather than following the evidence accurately toward a case by case conclusion.
A police force wanting to create a case for guilt and choosing which evidence fits their desired outcome rather than necessarily following the evidence as it arises partially due to the media pressures. They failed to release information/evidence that may have been helpful for the defence.
A Nurse who clearly had issues at the time, questioned herself to such a degree writing things down and feeling she somehow was culpable and inadvertently coming across as guilty or indeed a nurse that really was somehow cruel and guilty in some or all of the deaths.
Evidence presented as fact that was actually conjecture by experts that in some cases were not worthy of being called experts.
So much doubt exists that for the accused, the families, the babies themselves and most importantly to ensure true justice is sought, evidenced, presented and delivered for everyones sake above and beyond reasonable doubt, this has to be re-investigated with a completely open mind and leave no stone unturned in the process. By all means keeping Letby inside prison till everyone is clear and certain. Letby may be guilty, but others may also be guilty instead or even somehow alongside her.