sweet_left_foot
Well-known member
Charles II didn't have a great record with parliament.
No matter what I posted there’s never any need for abuse.Read your original post and think about why you might have got that reply. Not everyone will love the new "king".
You want the monarch to influence government policy so are either don't realise what that would mean or you do know so don't want a democracy.What a pleasant poster.
Ahem that was Charles the 1stCharles II didn't have a great record with parliament.
him as well. Third time unlucky?Ahem that was Charles the 1st
It's a hard act to follow.He'll come a distant second to the Queen no matter what he does.
Each to their own gunslinger but it’s here to stay.Only children should be interested in nonsense like kings, queens and princes as a history lesson, it's a medievil concept that belongs in the trash bin of a modern democratic society, sperm
dictating who rules who, hows uttery bizzare a notion
There was a 2021 survey, where 62% said they were Royalists. (33% in the 18-24 yr age group). The % in favour increases with age.I wonder what the % would be for/against the Monarchy?
I sincerely trust not.Each to their own gunslinger but it’s here to stay.
The monarchy aren’t going to go away anytime soon.I sincerely trust not.
Unfortunately, you're probably right, but we can always hope.The monarchy aren’t going to go away anytime soon.
The pro's of moving back to the UK clearly outweighed your hatred of anything royal, correct?Unfortunately, you're probably right, but we can always hope.
A lot of inner strength and bravery needed, fair play to him.Good speech from him.
Could tell he was holding back tears at the end (understandably).
A televised speech the day after the death of your mother seems cruel, regardless of convention.
Hoping doesn’t get what you want, if you want the monarchy gone you’ll have to do something about it.Unfortunately, you're probably right, but we can always hope.