ForssAwakens
Well-known member
Can we have permission to use cross season stats yet?
Most of those last dozen games don’t count do theyIts true …
Our form over the last dozen games is garbage
Say what you mean to say, if you want to hammer carrick then do it.Can we have permission to use cross season stats yet?
Why does it have to be one problem and not numerous?If you're using it as a stick to beat Carrick with, then fair enough. Crack on. Because really he is the only credible reason you'd use cross season stats. It's a very different team to last year. Carrick is the common denominator.
But if that's what you're doing then be honest about it. You're saying Carrick is the problem.
The Chairman and the recruitment team are also common denominators.If you're using it as a stick to beat Carrick with, then fair enough. Crack on. Because really he is the only credible reason you'd use cross season stats. It's a very different team to last year. Carrick is the common denominator.
But if that's what you're doing then be honest about it. You're saying Carrick is the problem.
Scott is also a common denominator.If you're using it as a stick to beat Carrick with, then fair enough. Crack on. Because really he is the only credible reason you'd use cross season stats. It's a very different team to last year. Carrick is the common denominator.
But if that's what you're doing then be honest about it. You're saying Carrick is the problem.
Yeah but we beat 10 man Huddersfield in the cup and then beat Bolton.Can we have permission to use cross season stats yet?
The Chairman and the recruitment team are also common denominators.
Maybe so. But I'm talking explicitly about form across both seasons. People are using the form at the end of last season as additional ammo against the side.Scott is also a common denominator.
He has a Bobby's job that lad.
Zero questions, zero accountability.
Ultimately the side we had at the end of last season fell off a cliff.Therefore if not Carrick, they're surely saying the side we had at the end of last season wasn't good enough anyway. Despite those moving on elsewhere costing circa £60m to their new clubs.
Which is fair enough.Why does it have to be one problem and not numerous?
Carrick is definitely part of the problem, don’t get me wrong I don’t want him sacked but he keeps making questionable decisions in regards to tactics and subs
So is it because they weren't good enough or is that down to the manager?Ultimately the side we had at the end of last season fell off a cliff.
Ramsey was more than good enough, but did not play the last 6 matches of last season - he was a major loss.But last season the recruitment team pulled together a side that went on an incredible run. So you're saying it's their fault the side tailed off at the back end of the season? Can't have it both ways.
Archer and Ramsey not good enough?