SmallTown
Well-known member
You argued that the Rwanda policy wasn't illegal.Yes I did. It is my opinion. Those in her article are hers. You didn't claim her points were facts. Good for you. There is no onus on me to claim more than that and you are not the officially appointed adjudicator on what it is permissible to say. However you now appear to be accusing me of a form of dishonesty. If you find it so painful I'm surprised you are so keen to continue posting on the subject. Go on though - have the last word.
It was, it was deemed so by the ECHR, so that's a fact you've argued against. You also argued that we were doing ok compared to "EC" countries. Assuming you mean EU than that's demonstrably untrue.
It's amazing how, even down to being confused about how to spell "EU" you act like same as before.