Jill Dando

B

Borothruandthru

Well-known member
Just read an online article which was rather alarming.
Apparently Barry George was fitted up for her murder by the establishment to conceal the real reason she was murdered.
Evidently she had a female friend , who's young daughter had been raped at a sex party, attended by none other than Prince Andrew.
She had been trying to research what had gone on and got too close to the truth.
Could be bollox but on the other hand it would be no surprise.
The police don't seem to be looking for anyone ?
 
Its cos the police have believed from very early on that George was responsible. That is extremely evident in the Netflix documentary that came out recently. If they were convinced he did it and never had other evidence pointing to anybody else they won't be looking for anyone.
 
The former gangster interviewed in the Netflix doc pretty much confirmed the real reason she was killed and who was responsible for the hit. It doesn't take much reading between the lines.
 
There are loads of different conspiracy theories and rumours, including some involving certain ex MPs etc.
 
Borothruandthru said:
Just read an online article which was rather alarming.
Apparently Barry George was fitted up for her murder by the establishment to conceal the real reason she was murdered.
Evidently she had a female friend , who's young daughter had been raped at a sex party, attended by none other than Prince Andrew.
She had been trying to research what had gone on and got too close to the truth.
Could be bollox but on the other hand it would be no surprise.
The police don't seem to be looking for anyone ?
Click to expand...
What a story, it's got it all.................

The Establishment ✅
Sordid sex party ✅
Prince Andrew ✅✅
Rape ✅
Amateur sleuthing ✅
Murder ✅

As story lines go it's kind of the House of Windsor meets Get Carter. All it needs is for the sex party to have taken place in the basement of the Pizza Express in Woking and I would say it's an absolute slam dunk.:rolleyes:
 
I think the main link seems to be her crime watch profile and how successful it was and it was ruffling feathers among the (London) criminal underworld.
 
I understand her brother is very much in the dark, but does have one concern - that Barry George chose not to give evidence, at either his trial or re-trial.

He (her brother) says: "I would just liked to have seen him tell a jury exactly what he was doing on that day, because he's never actually explained where he was. It's all a bit jumbled up. It would have been interesting to have heard him explain where he was, and for him to have been cross-examined about his movements on that day” It does seem odd that an innocent man would not want to justify his whereabouts confronted with such a serious charge.
 
Jedi boro said:
I think the main link seems to be her crime watch profile and how successful it was and it was ruffling feathers among the (London) criminal underworld.
Click to expand...
Oh come on. The main link was Barry George. He may have had his conviction quashed but that doesn’t mean he is innocent. There’s just not enough evidence to prove he is guilty. All those years in prison yet still didn’t pass the threshold for compensation. I think the police know it’s him but just can’t prove it.
 
I know a little bit about this, plus a watched the Netflix documentary and nothing I've seen has persuaded me it wasn't George.

A sex offender and fantasist with an obsession for guns and celebrities.

I actually think it may have been opportunist, rather than planned, but sadly it's unlikely the truth will ever be known.
 
MolteniArcore said:
I’d imagine his legal team told him not to do that. He may well have been keen to take the stand. Who knows?
Click to expand...
Clearly only Barry George and possibly his defence counsel. However, his silence is something that does raise alarm bells whilst also showing the prosecution evidence was far too circumstantial. It is no doubt why criminals nearly always plead innocent until the trial when the prosecution have submitted all their evidence and witness statements. It thus allows the defence to advise their client on the likelihood of a successful defence, hence why so many only change there plea at the last minute.

As I understand it, changing a plea to guilty at the last minute enables the possibility of a lower sentence to be given or a lesser charge to be offered to the prosecution, e.g. manslaughter over murder etc. Personally I don’t agree with criminals getting lower sentences where pleas are changed at the last minute, nor the way the crown prosecution service are often too quick to accept a guilty plea of a lesser charge. As pragmatic as I always claim I am, some situations should proceed on the more serious charges imho.
 
If you want to go down the Dando conspiracy rabbit hole, I find the Jeffrey Archer links far more compelling
 
Jonny Ingbar said:
I know a little bit about this, plus a watched the Netflix documentary and nothing I've seen has persuaded me it wasn't George.

A sex offender and fantasist with an obsession for guns and celebrities.

I actually think it may have been opportunist, rather than planned, but sadly it's unlikely the truth will ever be known.
Click to expand...
Plus he clearly lied in his police interview and continues to lie to this day claiming the photo the police found of him wearing the balaclava pointing the gun at the camera wasn't him. His eyes were and continue to be so distinctive that the person in the picture is so clearly him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top