It's always Jam Tomorrow with #BentBen Houchen

[ThePrisoner]

As posters know I want the area redeveloped so it can still support a significant population, opposed to seeing the area as a post-industrial nature reserve.

Can you imagine Wilton covered in trees and full of birds, forest creatures, streams and woodland paths? Would bring thousands to visit every day ad pump millions into the economy. Lazenby could become a latter day Ambleside.

 

[thewanderer]

As posters know I want the area redeveloped so it can still support a significant population, opposed to seeing the area as a post-industrial nature reserve. With a near by working class population dependent predominately on welfare benefits or drug dealing and retired folk reminiscening about working for ICI and British Steel in the 1970s.

I'd like to see some new facilities going up, not just videos of things being blown up and plans of how its going to look in 2035.

Indeed. The "industrial heritage" bores are the worst.

 

[Teesside Crab Killer]

Ray Casey has wrote that same article numerous times with no evidence to back it up other than a quote from one person at bloomberg.

The article contains 31 links. You appear to have read only one of them.

 

[Teesside Crab Killer]

Ray Casey has wrote that same article numerous times with no evidence to back it up other than a quote from one person at bloomberg.

The article contains links to 31 different sources. You appear to have read only one of them.

 

[BlindBoyGrunt]

The article contains 31 links. You appear to have read only one of them.

The two links I referred to are in the first two paragraphs so next time you see your friend ask him these two questions.

1. Why did he include an ammonia plant closing down due to energy costs, as them not being onboard with carbon capture?
2. Why did he wilfully misquote the Bloomberg article?

There is enough material to nail Houchen for any serious investigative journalist, so there's no need to lie.

 

[thewanderer]

The article contains 31 links. You appear to have read only one of them.

Hello Ray.

 

[motownjunk]

The two links I referred to are in the first two paragraphs so next time you see your friend ask him these two questions.

1. Why did he include an ammonia plant closing down due to energy costs, as them not being onboard with carbon capture?
2. Why did he wilfully misquote the Bloomberg article?

There is enough material to nail Houchen for any serious investigative journalist, so there's no need to lie.

He included the cf ammonia plant because it was included in the original list of companies in the link. The Bloomberg article I think there are better sources around to back up that hydrogen is pretty much a dead duck in the short term, certainly without huge state investment.