It was Corbyn wot did it 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

BlindBoyGrunt said:
Yesterday the Times had an article about what would have happened under Corbyn, and what Diane Abbott would have said and McDonnell and Burgon would have done. They can't leave him alone.
Click to expand...
It's because they can't defend their own failures, so instead they will hypothesise someone elses and discuss that
 
Norman_Conquest said:
I totally get what you are saying and what the reporters aim was, but I think it is lazy for the fact they have sat on their settee and made an article out of nothing, instead of getting out their and researching a real story.
Click to expand...

Oh I'm sure that's true as well.
 
Redwurzel said:
I buy the Daily Mail on a Saturday, so I am one of the idiots that takes it all in and believes it.

Of course not....I like the coverage of Sport and Business and in particular the large weekly TV guide that comes with the Saturday edition. In a few minutes you can quickly pick out any potentially interesting programmes from about 80 different channels. For example Sky History programme tonight at 8pm about a 16th century siege at Barnard Castle. Some of my ancestors may have been there as one side of my family ancestors are well established Upper Teesdale folk.

Recently the paper has been critical of the Government and in particular Government departments. I tend to imagine a Daily Mail journalist is like Victor Meldew. i.e. They always need something to complain about.
Click to expand...
Aha rumbled.😀 Now we know you’re fibbing because the Daily Mail has the worst (especially football) sports coverage of any newspaper out there!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top