It was Corbyn wot did it 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Juan-sheet

Well-known member
must admit I scan there pages on the web everyday... just for a laugh and to see how Katy Price is doing.. (joke)
 
Interestingly look at the top rated comments:-

Screenshot_2020-08-16-08-25-13-666_com.android.chrome.jpg
Doesn't look like they buy it to me. So maybe they're not all lunatics eh.
 
Apparently Corbyn’s Marxist henchman is guilty of giving bozo Covid & it was his fault puppet master Cummins had to do the Durham dash.
I have said all along I would rather believe the Sunday sport before I believe anything this lying rag ever printed.
Sad thing is bozo & the borisettes will believe every word 😢
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...s-Milne-infect-Boris-Johnson-coronavirus.html
The Daily Mail cabale refuse to believe that wandering around Covid wards like a buffoon shaking hands with patients had absolutely nothing to do with it. It was all about your politics don't you know.
 
Yesterday the Times had an article about what would have happened under Corbyn, and what Diane Abbott would have said and McDonnell and Burgon would have done. They can't leave him alone.
 
This is how the Daily Mail works on it's gullible readers. It opens with the statement:
"Jeremy Corbyn was last night at the centre of extraordinary claims that Boris Johnson was infected with coronavirus during a visit to Downing Street by the former Labour leader and his Marxist-sympathising aide."

Read down and you discover that the extraordinary claims originate within the article. Then further down:
"A Downing Street source said it was 'unclear how the Prime Minister had been infected' and Mr Johnson 'was not pointing the finger at Seumas'."
 
To be honest you would be hard pressed to find the thickest cabinet member amongst this current crop of comedians ....the Mail today says Priti Vacant says the asylum seekers are heading here because....wait for it !!!!! THE FRENCH ARE RACISTS.....:rolleyes:
 
To be honest you would be hard pressed to find the thickest cabinet member amongst this current crop of comedians ....the Mail today says Priti Vacant says the asylum seekers are heading here because....wait for it !!!!! THE FRENCH ARE RACISTS.....:rolleyes:
I assume she has evidence of that which couldn't also be applied to the UK.
 
This is how the Daily Mail works on it's gullible readers. It opens with the statement:
"Jeremy Corbyn was last night at the centre of extraordinary claims that Boris Johnson was infected with coronavirus during a visit to Downing Street by the former Labour leader and his Marxist-sympathising aide."

Read down and you discover that the extraordinary claims originate within the article. Then further down:
"A Downing Street source said it was 'unclear how the Prime Minister had been infected' and Mr Johnson 'was not pointing the finger at Seumas'."
What you have described there is every lazy journalist. How many times have you seen clubs linked with a certain player using the same tactic.
 
I buy the Daily Mail on a Saturday, so I am one of the idiots that takes it all in and believes it.

Of course not....I like the coverage of Sport and Business and in particular the large weekly TV guide that comes with the Saturday edition. In a few minutes you can quickly pick out any potentially interesting programmes from about 80 different channels. For example Sky History programme tonight at 8pm about a 16th century siege at Barnard Castle. Some of my ancestors may have been there as one side of my family ancestors are well established Upper Teesdale folk.

Recently the paper has been critical of the Government and in particular Government departments. I tend to imagine a Daily Mail journalist is like Victor Meldew. i.e. They always need something to complain about.
 
What you have described there is every lazy journalist. How many times have you seen clubs linked with a certain player using the same tactic.

I don't think it's lazy at all from the Mail. By writing the piece in that way they haven't said anything directly false, but at the same time they have manufactured some doubt in the minds of many readers. It's their way of operating (and they are not the only ones).
 
I don't think it's lazy at all from the Mail. By writing the piece in that way they haven't said anything directly false, but at the same time they have manufactured some doubt in the minds of many readers. It's their way of operating (and they are not the only ones).
I totally get what you are saying and what the reporters aim was, but I think it is lazy for the fact they have sat on their settee and made an article out of nothing, instead of getting out there and researching a real story.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top