See post 59 above.Whichever way it is done, the club needs to be investing in the youth. That is the future of the club, so getting them in early and hooked is the key, but it needs to be affordable & currently it isn't.
Massive MASSIVE sweeping generalisation, and .... well .... complete bollox.The biggest waste of money is offering massive discounts for the over 65s. That demographic are no longer the poor demographic it used to be
Of course it's a generalisation. That's how statistics work. We don't means test fans so we are saying that OAPs are 25% poorer than working age adults but the statistics don't match. The wealthiest generation are getting a big discount that on average they don't need.Massive MASSIVE sweeping generalisation, and .... well .... complete bollox.
Some over 65s may be better off than previous generations, but by no means a majority - chuck as many of your handpicked statistics at me as you want, and I'll throw back the thousands that I see struggling in the course of my work, and that's just in one small, relatively well off Council area (in the UK)
This is what Steve Gibson said last season about the GRFZ -He provided all the data to support it too.
We had 19,061 SC holders exc Hospitality.
They generated £6,508,472.33 according to the club.
That is £341.45 per SC, or £14.85 per match, or £12.37 per match ex VAT.
The entire GRFZ generated £930,636.42 from 4,049 SC holders.
21% of the SC's generated 14% of the SC revenue.
In that Zone:
1616 Adults paid £469.44 each, roughly the same as in North, South and Corners.
725 U11's went Free.
169 U11's (2nd kid) paid £9,475, so £2 per match ex VAT.
791 U18's paid £34,153, so £1.56 per match ex VAT
416 U18's (2nd kid) paid £40,108, so £3.49 per match ex VAT.
18 18-21's paid £4,608, so £9.28 per match ex VAT.
264 Over 65's paid £83,408, so £11.45 per match.
50 PA's went Free.
2,101 U18's in that Zone generated £83,736.90 inc VAT.
Or on average paid £1.44 per match ex VAT.
The 288 Over 65 SC holders in the NW corner generated more than 2,101 U18's in GRFZ.
467 U18's in the West Lower generated the same revenue, whilst themselves only paying £6.22 per match ex VAT.
The GRFZ is an idiotic scheme.
The U18 pricing for EB SC's is good value.
The pricing for new SC holders is obscene.
The matchday pricing inc for Kids is a disgrace.
The kids are cheap everywhere in the stadium.This is what Steve Gibson said last season about the GRFZ -
we need families and kids in. The reason for our being is to offer safety, excitement, enjoyment and that is enhanced when it is a family unit.
The commercial department of the club backed this up by saying that the % of take up of season tickets for kids after the GRFZ is really high. ie the zone seems to hook families long term. We get fans for life from this safe and family friendly zone.
No, I mean that the figures show that they remain season ticket holders after GRFZ - the area has been there for long enough now that many kids have graduated, if you see what I mean, to other areas of the ground. Have you looked behind the scenes in there? It is very different to the rest of the stadium. As well as being painted by and for kids. They have different food etc and have special game areas, activities and themed days - events etc start a couple of hours before kick off. It is in some ways a model for how the Riverside matchday experience could be expanded for those that want it pre-match and after-match.The kids are cheap everywhere in the stadium.
They don't have to be free in the GRFZ, as 2,101 virtually are.
It is idiotic.
The zone is sold out/hugely restricted because it is so crazily free for so many kids.
Of course people will stay hooked in because they aren't paying anything for doing so. It is a barmy claim to point at commitment.
That is why so many miss so many matches. It doesn't matter because they haven't paid anything anyway.
A kid could go and their parents pay literally nothing for them until they are 12 years of age, then pay a bag of toffees per match (£1.87) until they are 18.
The "Commercial Department"?.. don't make me laugh.
It is so stupid a scheme only MFC could come with it.
The 2,101 U18's in the GRFZ generated £83,736.90 inc VAT last season.
We had 5,131 U18 SC holders in total.
The 3,030 outside GRFZ paid £523,725.24 inc VAT.
I don't think they get a bad deal as Ive gone on about, but seriously
is it only the kids inside GRFZ that offer the club hope?
God help us
I'm not knocking you Rob. If it seems that way then I genuinely apologise.No, I mean that the figures show that they remain season ticket holders after GRFZ - the area has been there for long enough now that many kids have graduated, if you see what I mean, to other areas of the ground. Have you looked behind the scenes in there? It is very different to the rest of the stadium. As well as being painted by and for kids. They have different food etc and have special game areas, activities and themed days - events etc start a couple of hours before kick off. It is in some ways a model for how the Riverside matchday experience could be expanded for those that want it pre-match and after-match.
Not when you compare it to every other club in the league. In fact it's quite the opposite.The kids are cheap everywhere in the stadium.
I was going to say the same - I have never heard of a season ticket waiting list @ MFC in the family zone and its never been mentioned on here to my knowledge until this week.GRFZ is nowhere near sold out, the row I’m on in empty nearly every week, even Sunderland.
I just rang up last year and asked for 2 season tickets and got them straight away, no waiting list or anything.
Is this for a ST when they were/are available?Just seen on Twitter someone said there husband rang up to enquire about the GRFZ but were told it's sold out, however they could be put on a waiting list. But they would need to pay now! Therefore paying for seats they are not guaranteed.
Surely there has been some wires crossed! Or it's more inept work from the club or someone working in the ticket office
I am with you on this, but income would be more relevant. I seem to remember seeing a figure of £30k a year for over 65s which will shock some on here. Quite a few now are have form of private pension income say from ICI or British Steel on Teesside or public sector job.Of course it's a generalisation. That's how statistics work. We don't means test fans so we are saying that OAPs are 25% poorer than working age adults but the statistics don't match. The wealthiest generation are getting a big discount that on average they don't need.
There are people struggling in every demographic and there are people that are wealthy in every demographic. On average the 65+ demographic is more wealthy than every other age group except the 55-65 age group. There are thousands of people struggling and have children that have to pay full price for them and pay for their kids. The younger generation doesn't have the benefit of buying houses like the previous generations did. The majority of young people have a negative balance in their savings. They have more debt than savings. They don't own property, they'll never have a final salary pension, might not even get a state pension until they are in their 70s, they are paying thousands for childcare etc.
Nobody is saying that every over 65 can afford to pay full price but on average they don't need subsidising. People that are 80+ probably don't have the wealth the baby boomers had so that OAP age probably should have risen with them.
View attachment 71892
Physical Wealth = Things you own (cars, house contents etc), Property = house equity, Financial = savings and investments.
Another poster on here has confirmed this was also the case this season.Is this for a ST when they were/are available?
How do you know the writer is telling the truth? i.e loves spreading negative news etc