Hancock v Oakeshott

[TheYorkshireTerrier]

You can say what you like about Oakeshott, but she is undoubtedly attractive.

Your bar must be very low.

 

[Sheriff_John_Bunnell_ret]

Having read the list of leaks this person is responsible for Hancock would have to be incredibly stupid to employ this woman. I can't imagine that anyone could be that stupid and achieve any position of power. So it must be to sell copies of his book. What a ****.

 

[Angus]

Matt Hancock is a fool only interested in making money whilst he has some time in the public consciousness.

Oakeshott is truly odious. I hope I never bump into her if she becomes the “First Lady of Hartlepool.”

 

[FatFrank]

A fitting representation of the appalling binfire that is the current state of British politics and its news media.

Exceptional description.

 

[Steer]

How does someone with such little going on between his ears end up in with of the most important jobs in the country.

 

[ForssAwakens]

There is a school of thought that suggests it was done with Hancocks blessing in order to create interest in his book, which has hardly been flying off the shelves.

@fmttmadmin this would also been classed a conspiracy theory….

 

[Ex Footy Legs]

I definitely didn't do it ( publish his Whatsapp messages) for the money she said

She’s extreme right wing nut job….not short of money and thinks the Tories are left wing(!) that’s the worrying aspect.
She thinks the government locked down for flimsy reasons….and ultimately she couldn’t care less about real people, just her agenda.
She’s a full blown narcissist or sociopath along with her partner : Rice.
Lunatics the pair of them….

She has no conscience and is sicker than Hancock although he is a another sociopath but she’s further along the spectrum than he is

 

[Honey_Glazed_Sausages]

She is lovely to look at

 

[Keelo]

She is lovely to look at

Should have gone to Specsavers...,

 

[Jonny Ingbar]

@fmttmadmin this would also been classed a conspiracy theory….

Excusez moi?

 

[ForssAwakens]

Excusez moi?

Haha, it’s around censorship another thread and using your post as an example how this doesn’t differ.

I’m more trying to promote free speech as long as it isn’t libel or pure conspiracy

 

[atypical_boro]

You can say what you like about Oakeshott, but she is undoubtedly attractive.

She is. You don't have to like someone to find them physically attractive.

 

[Honey_Glazed_Sausages]

She is. You don't have to like someone to find them physically attractive.

A bit like Traudl Junge is Downfall I guess

 

[BoroFur]

She is lovely to look at

Really?

 

[atypical_boro]

A bit like Traudl Junge is Downfall I guess

Well the actress hasn't actually done anything bad as far as I'm aware.

 

[atypical_boro]

Really?

View attachment 53889

That's a bad photo, but even then she's a solid 7.

 

[Keelo]

I wonder how much she paid to get that photoshopped?
But apart from how she looks,if you know who she is that should be enough to be repulsed by her....... absolutely odious individual

 

[atypical_boro]

I wonder how much she paid to get that photoshopped?
But apart from how she looks,if you know who she is that should be enough to be repulsed by her....... absolutely odious individual

On QT she usually looks decent I think, not sure there's any photo-shopping going on on there.

As I say you don't have to like someone's political opinions to think they're decent to look at. They're two completely independent things.

 

[Jonny Ingbar]

Haha, it’s around censorship another thread and using your post as an example how this doesn’t differ.

I’m more trying to promote free speech as long as it isn’t libel or pure conspiracy

Ah, I'll call of my legal team

 

[ForssAwakens]

Ah, I'll call of my legal team

Phew