atypical_boro
Well-known member
Agree with this.No it wasn't. Probably at least five years since I've seen that used here and more like over ten when it was "common".
Agree with this.No it wasn't. Probably at least five years since I've seen that used here and more like over ten when it was "common".
It was used a lot for a particularly famous Geordie girl-band member as I recall. She won’t read this board will she (not our rivals). Everyone relax.Interesting though. If a woman/celebrity reads up on the past threads and notices that her name was mentioned in the same sentence as having her "back doors smashed in", would we expect a knock on the door from the police?
Wallace is not the victim here. Let’s make that clear.There’s been changes to the equalities act that came into force last month. They are aimed at prevention, I reckon Greg is the poster boy for the new rules.
When I started work in the late 90’s a big group of blokes went out all day at Christmas. Part of that was discussing the best looking girls in the office and ranking them. Everyone knew this happened (including the girls), but that type of talk was never acceptable in the office.Society has changed massively in the last ten to fifteen years. I’m not sure I’ma fan of applying today’s rules to things people have said 10+ years ago.
Should those blokes be named and shamed on social media today and lose their careers over it?When I started work in the late 90’s a big group of blokes went out all day at Christmas. Part of that was discussing the best looking girls in the office and ranking them. Everyone knew this happened (including the girls), but that type of talk was never acceptable in the office.
I think the Richard Keys and Andy Gray stuff all those years ago was a little bit of a turning point where some men realised wow if they get sacked for saying that maybe I should not say stuff like that in public.When I started work in the late 90’s a big group of blokes went out all day at Christmas. Part of that was discussing the best looking girls in the office and ranking them. Everyone knew this happened (including the girls), but that type of talk was never acceptable in the office.
I don’t think it’s ever been acceptable to act the way Wallace allegedly has. What has probably changed is men realising their behaviour impacts most women in ways they never acknowledged.
The point is the conversation wasn’t in front of women, where it would without doubt cause offence and not be right.Should those blokes be named and shamed on social media today and lose their careers over it?
Society has changed massively in the last ten to fifteen years. I’m not sure I’m a fan of applying today’s rules to things people have said 10+ years ago.
Is it?It's a long history of sexual harassment and abuse towards staff and contestants.
Is it?
I’ve seen stuff he’s said but sexual abuse? Any links to that?
Sexual harassment and abuse you said. Evidence?I didn't say sexual abuse.
Sexual harassment and abuse you said. Evidence?
Abuse + sexual harassment does not have to = sexual abuse.Sexual harassment and abuse you said. Evidence?
You’ve said it a different way around though.Abuse + sexual harassment does not have to = sexual abuse.