Fascinating Politics

It's been a mess since privatisation, the fare system is crazy and franchise system just pumps money to companies to pay out to shareholders with no incentive to deliver an excellent service or even a bog standard service most of the time eg on my local service if a train's late they miss my station out to catch up some time and they drop you off the station before to catch the next train. Not sure how they're organised but using trains in Germany, France, Holland, Belgium etc is cheaper and more reliable in my experience
In the summer of 2019 we flew into London and took the Eurostar to Amsterdam, using trains and buses to get around Holland and Belgium before getting the Eurostar back to London and the LNER to Darlington. The difference between Dutch and Belgian trains, even the local ones and LNER was stark. It seems we should not have attempted to use a train while the Edinburgh Festival was on. Luggage and people piled high in the corridors. Just as well we had reserved seats.
 
In short, Jeremy Corbyn was right.

This is just another attempt to paper over the cracks caused by the failure of privatisation. Pragmatism has nothing to do with it, this is driven by political dogma and the Right Wing rigid tenet to never admit a mistake.
 
Infrastructure, in general, should mostly be state-owned. Making a profit on things essential for society is morally bankrupt.

Education
Power
Transport

All should be publically owned and profits used to lower costs and invest in further infrastructure, not lining the pockets of shareholders and Tory donors.

Sorry edit to say ANY political party donors!
 
Last edited:
Anything that’s a step in the direction of renationalisation should be seen as a good thing and a state ran rail company competing on the free market is a positive move for me.

State ran alternative providers should be available across the board in businesses as diverse as transport, insurance, energy and even shopping, these schemes should be ran to return a profit that will boost the governments coffers and give people the chance to support the country without creating monopolies.
 
Anything that’s a step in the direction of renationalisation should be seen as a good thing and a state ran rail company competing on the free market is a positive move for me.

State ran alternative providers should be available across the board in businesses as diverse as transport, insurance, energy and even shopping, these schemes should be ran to return a profit that will boost the governments coffers and give people the chance to support the country without creating monopolies.
They should do the same with bus infrastructure and then integrate with the trains.
 
I deal with Network Rail regularly (unfortunately), it's the worst ran company I've ever come across, and it gets worse each year, and that includes man in a van cowboy builders.

Unless they literally strip every procedure out, open their eyes and start again, it's going to fail or the tickets will rise exponentially, the company is infected, it's like a cancer. There's a feedback loop of ridiculousness, which is unbelievable unless you see it in detail.

Their "technical department" are absolutely laughable, they told me that I had made up how 99.5% of my industry operates (I've not, and I'm one of the most thorough). They had no idea that the other 0.5% was just companies just pacifying them with backwards procedures when using their land, as it's easier to do that, rather than trying to explain anything to them (which takes about a year). Basically, companies get forced to do things by NR, which are not the right way, and which carry more risk, it's mental. Or the alternative is after you've actually explained it to them for a year, they don't update their procedures, so you end up having to do it all over again next time.

Their structures team, have no structure.

You can never get a group of them at a meeting, not unless it's for their gain. They have no knowledge so hide behind e-mails, so they don't get put on the spot face to face.

Their land ownership department once tried to get me to use some land that they had sold 2 years earlier, and then tried to bill me 20k for the years worth of too and fro to figure this out. Obviously, I told them to stick it. That project is still going on now, it's been 5 years, and the job would have been done in 4 hours, at zero risk.

They want £100m insurance, to cross their track with any infrastructure (industry standard is £10m), yet when their track crosses private land, they don't even ask permission to use the private land for access and just do whatever they like (obviously not insured).

None of their departments seem capable of speaking to each other, and they act independently so there is never one way to progress a project forward logically. You end up zig-zagging in various directions to tick boxes that are irrelevant, and then later boxes/ requirements counter their original requirements, it's bananas.

It's annoying me even thinking about it 🙈
 
Back
Top