viv_andersons_nana
Well-known member
You could see from the first replay that Spurs goal was onside. 4 minutes wasted, poring over countless replays to decide something that could’ve been decided after one.
**** VAR.
**** VAR.
It depends on who is winning when they add the time onThat period of football that was played between Brentford appealing for a penalty and the ref stopping to check the telly, is that added on at the end of the half?
VAR checking… team badge.It depends on who is winning when they add the time on
Ivan Toney still lurking in the backgro7nd?Legalised match fixing.
Me too. Catches him on the top of the ankle.Thought it was a pen myself. Hit his foot and totally unbalanced him?
Refs fault. They need to stand up and say that's not caused him to fall over. He took another step and then threw himself to the floor.Pathetic decision to give that as a penalty.
Refs fault. They need to stand up and say that's not caused him to fall over. He took another step and then threw himself to the floor.
Refs need to overule VAR more often. Not a clear and obvious mistake.
'the right' to go down' cheat's chantRefs fault. They need to stand up and say that's not caused him to fall over. He took another step and then threw himself to the floor.
Refs need to overule VAR more often. Not a clear and obvious mistake.
There was contact, it was a penalty.Yep I thought the first one was initially offside till you saw it again and again. As Viv said though 4 mins is more than a bit rich as they are supposed to monitor it from the second the ref gives it, Maybe they have to apply all the various angles and technology and they are a bit cr@p at applying it quickly?
I thought in real time it was a pen, you don’t drop like he did unless it hurt. Ankle kicks really do hurt and he was kicked right on the ankle. I think the slo mo makes it look softer than it was personally, so totally get why many think it wasn’t a pen
My biggest gripe on VAR is the inconsistency that you see between different officials interpreting it.