Mendieta14
Well-known member
no harm having a look.
I wish folk would stop saying Payero needed replacing. He didn't play and when he did he either got injured or failed to impress (bar Cardiff away).We shouldn't have put ourselves in this position.Letting Payero go without a replacement.
Would you want Clayton now though?Decent signing if we go ahead. There was always a debate in our promotion season (and possibly the season before) who the best midfielder in the league was - Clayton or Stephens.
Payero didn't play much but he was our cover in the 2nd half of the season. He got injured so Tav, Howson and Crooks played 90 mins of every game. We needed to replace the cover be was supposed to provide.I wish folk would stop saying Payero needed replacing. He didn't play and when he did he either got injured or failed to impress (bar Cardiff away).
He genuinely gets 'better' with every passing week in some people's eyes. I'd expect Massimo or Stephens to actually make more appearances than him and they cost nothing
He didn't need replacing. Just like when people say Wood/Coulson/Hall and Uche did. They simply didn't as never played.
They are the same age (33), hope Stephens hasn't deteriorated as much as Adam Clayton has in the last 2 yearsWould you want Clayton now though?
They are the same age (33), hope Stephens has deteriorated as much as Adam Clayton has in the last 2 years
EditedHasn't, surely?
If he has, it would be a disaster of a signing. He's at Donny now I think. Not sure if he's still getting a game or not.They are the same age (33), hope Stephens hasn't deteriorated as much as Adam Clayton has in the last 2 years
If he has, it would be a disaster of a signing. He's at Donny now I think. Not sure if he's still getting a game or not.
SkipdogIf he has, it would be a disaster of a signing. He's at Donny now I think. Not sure if he's still getting a game or not.
Truly terrible player. The turning circle of an oil tankerDecent player for cover if he can stay free from injury.