Covid inquiry evidence

You absolutely know there is absolutely nothing incriminating for Bozo. He's renowned for not keeping the correct records, being slapdash and disorganised, leading life off the cuff. I think if people are expecting it will be he who is hauled over the coals......may be in for a disappointment. Other ministers though ........🤔🤔.
 
h_m_boro said:
You absolutely know there is absolutely nothing incriminating for Bozo. He's renowned for not keeping the correct records, being slapdash and disorganised, leading life off the cuff. I think if people are expecting it will be he who is hauled over the coals......may be in for a disappointment. Other ministers though ........🤔🤔.
Click to expand...
I agree.

There is no way the government are going to these lengths to protect Johnson.
 
Ziggy said:
The redoubtable @carolvorders

“This Tory government disgusts me.
Bethell was the Minister in charge of Covid Contracts. He was a close ally of Hancock. Bethell did a lot of dealing on his phone. Guess what? He replaced his phone in 2021 cos the other one was "broken".. Well well well who'd have thought it?

Meanwhile there’s people claiming that given the phone number and password WhatsApp messages are still retrievable.
Click to expand...
They are retrievable u less you specifically remove the default setting to ensure they aren’t retrievable.

In large blue chip businesses, conducting work over non-approved devices and applications is sackable. Try sending contracts from your work laptop onto your own personal email and you’ll have cyber security locking your machine down and HR handing you your P45. The same must now be part of government business.

On top of that should you send personal information on a government device, that should be monitored and be the property of the government and no longer deemed personal.

This Is normal in most businesses these days. MPs, specifically Tory ones, seem to want their own privileged set of rules again
 
BoroMart said:
They are retrievable u less you specifically remove the default setting to ensure they aren’t retrievable.

In large blue chip businesses, conducting work over non-approved devices and applications is sackable. Try sending contracts from your work laptop onto your own personal email and you’ll have cyber security locking your machine down and HR handing you your P45. The same must now be part of government business.

On top of that should you send personal information on a government device, that should be monitored and be the property of the government and no longer deemed personal.

This Is normal in most businesses these days. MPs, specifically Tory ones, seem to want their own privileged set of rules again
Click to expand...
Criminals used encrypted phones for years .....can't believe the Tories missed this trick......
 
BoroMart said:
They are retrievable u less you specifically remove the default setting to ensure they aren’t retrievable.

In large blue chip businesses, conducting work over non-approved devices and applications is sackable. Try sending contracts from your work laptop onto your own personal email and you’ll have cyber security locking your machine down and HR handing you your P45. The same must now be part of government business.

On top of that should you send personal information on a government device, that should be monitored and be the property of the government and no longer deemed personal.

This Is normal in most businesses these days. MPs, specifically Tory ones, seem to want their own privileged set of rules again
Click to expand...

Don’t forget B_Mart..that when he was Foreign Secretary the security services refused to furnish him with full ‘spectrum analysis’ reports, because among other, things he didn’t engage his brain when in full verbal flow. So I would imagine they kept a very close eye, and ear to all his communications. They have certainly done it in the past with others.
In the Peter Wright book…”We bugged and burgled our way across London” and he wasn’t just talking about foreign politicians.
 
BoroMart said:
They are retrievable u less you specifically remove the default setting to ensure they aren’t retrievable.

In large blue chip businesses, conducting work over non-approved devices and applications is sackable. Try sending contracts from your work laptop onto your own personal email and you’ll have cyber security locking your machine down and HR handing you your P45. The same must now be part of government business.

On top of that should you send personal information on a government device, that should be monitored and be the property of the government and no longer deemed personal.

This Is normal in most businesses these days. MPs, specifically Tory ones, seem to want their own privileged set of rules again
Click to expand...
I am not sure this is true in most circumstances. Most organisations will ask for an explanation from you as to why. I know this because it happened to me.
 
Government trying to spin this defeat as success :rolleyes:

I think they have misunderstood the judgement, it is not for them to 'have an arrangement', it is for them to provide the messages in full and allow the chair to deem what is relevant and what is not.
 

Attachments

  • covid 2.jpg
    covid 2.jpg
    196.5 KB · Views: 20
sherlock1969 said:
Government trying to spin this defeat as success :rolleyes:

I think they have misunderstood the judgement, it is not for them to 'have an arrangement', it is for them to provide the messages in full and allow the chair to deem what is relevant and what is not.
Click to expand...
Haha, yeah, the arrangement is "you give us all your messages, and we won't charge you".
 
sherlock1969 said:
Shocking evidence coming out today showing how Johnson and Sunak ignored the scientific evidence and just made it up as they went along 😡

x.com

x.com x.com

x.com

x.com x.com

x.com

x.com x.com

x.com

x.com x.com

x.com

x.com x.com
Click to expand...
I pointed this out the time, to many people, many times. It was blindingly obvious, even just with basic numeracy skills, didn't even need any epidemiology knowledge.

That eat out to help out one was nuts, how that only applied to "eat-in" food, not take-aways, WTF on earth was that about?
 
Last edited:
Not much, if any, mainstream media coverage of the inquiry sittings over the last couple of days.

Gove has been shown to be the repellent corrupt scum-bag he is, instructing that Dyson ventilators be bought instead of usual equipment suppliers and giving PPE contracts out to his mates. He should be in prison along with the rest of the tory scum.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top