Chuba.

I don't think so because I thought there was a rule where you had to have the same pitch size for the whole season. I might be completely wrong but if it was possible to change then teams would be adjusting it every week depending on the opposition.
I’m pretty sure that’s the case. You have to register your pitch dimensions at the beginning of the season and stick to it. Otherwise you’ll get crafty managers who will unannounced widen/narrow/shorten/lengthen the pitch on a match by match basis as a tactic and that would clearly be nonsense
 
Lets update this then:

Championship over 25 goals (last 10 years):

43 - Mitrovic
31 - Toney
29 - Solanke, Pukki
28 - Armstrong, McCormack
27 - Wood, Murphy, Mitrovic, Akpom


He has now outscored - Rhodes, Watkins, Abraham, Maupay, and Gray's best seasons in the last 10 years. Adam Armstrong and Ross McCormack are the next targets and with 4 games to go Toney is still catchable.

In the Boro all-time list:

- He is now level with John O'Rourke's 27 goals in 66/67 and no one has had a better goalscoring season for us in 60 years, since Alan Peacock in 62/63

- Only 7 people have had better goalscoring seasons than this one. The top two are obviously out of site, 3rd place is a real stretch, but the next 4 are not impossible. The list is :
-- Camsell 59
-- Clough 43
-- Fenton 34
-- Wilson 32
-- McClelland 32
-- Elliot 31
-- Peacock 31
 
I thought it might be interesting to give each seasons goals a weighting, under the impression that far more goals per game were scored in footballs earlier days than now. But then I realised 2 things.
1. I'm **** at maths so wouldn't know how to do it.
2. As soon as you get into the twentieth century there isn't anywhere near the reduction in goals as time goes by as I'd assumed.

For example 1923/24 had the fourth lowest goals per game in football league history.

Quite interesting data regardless if you are into that sort of thing.


Shame it isn't sortable but it's the best my googling skills could come up with. There is some correlation. No seasons after the 60s in the top 50.
 
I think he’ll beat Toney with a game to spare.
He needs 4 goals in the last 4 games to equal Toney. 1 goal per game is roughly what he averages so it's possible. If he gets to 31 he'll have done it playing 39 games (36 starts). Toney played 45 (44 starts) so his goals per game is much higher (currently Akpom has a goal every 105mins, Toney was 124). For reference Mitrovic scored 43 in 44 games (44 starts) at a rate of one goal every 89 mins. Akpom would be close to his record if he hadn't missed that chunk of games.

I had assumed that he would get 30 league goals because we had the playoffs but looking at the stats the playoffs are seen as a separate competition. Toney got another 2 goals that season in the playoffs.
 
For example 1923/24 had the fourth lowest goals per game in football league history.
The thing to remember through, is that the low rate of goalscoring in the early parts of the 20th century, especially into the early 1920's, was because the offside law was different. Up until 1925 the number of opponents required to be between the player and the opponent's goal line, was three.

The law has been this way since 1867 and by the early 1920's full-backs had developed an almost fool-proof tactic to catch attacking players offside. They would position themselves almost up to the halfway line, with one staggered slightly behind the other.

By keeping in a diagonal line, the full-backs could easily catch attacking players offside as they advanced past the first of the two. And should an attacking player run through after a long ball, he still had the other defending player to beat - and the goalkeeper. Defenders became so successful in using this strategy to catch attacking players offside that the game became extremely monotonous, with constant stoppages for offside offences.

So in 1925, in an effort to increase the number of goals being scored, the number of opponents was reduced from three to two.

The change clearly had the desired effect as the number of goals scored in the 1925/26 season was up by nearly 33% from the previous season.

So you shouldn't really include the years before 1925 if you're doing a comparison of goals per game, because the conditions were so significantly different.
 
The thing to remember through, is that the low rate of goalscoring in the early parts of the 20th century, especially into the early 1920's, was because the offside law was different. Up until 1925 the number of opponents required to be between the player and the opponent's goal line, was three.

The law has been this way since 1867 and by the early 1920's full-backs had developed an almost fool-proof tactic to catch attacking players offside. They would position themselves almost up to the halfway line, with one staggered slightly behind the other.

By keeping in a diagonal line, the full-backs could easily catch attacking players offside as they advanced past the first of the two. And should an attacking player run through after a long ball, he still had the other defending player to beat - and the goalkeeper. Defenders became so successful in using this strategy to catch attacking players offside that the game became extremely monotonous, with constant stoppages for offside offences.

So in 1925, in an effort to increase the number of goals being scored, the number of opponents was reduced from three to two.

The change clearly had the desired effect as the number of goals scored in the 1925/26 season was up by nearly 33% from the previous season.

So you shouldn't really include the years before 1925 if you're doing a comparison of goals per game, because the conditions were so significantly different.

Which Boro players in the above list are pre-'offisde rule change'. Elliot?
 
Back
Top