ThePrisoner
Well-known member
If this government gets its way they will be able to overturn court judgements and make their own decisions. Quite a terrifying prospect.What about this case?
If this government gets its way they will be able to overturn court judgements and make their own decisions. Quite a terrifying prospect.What about this case?
This lad has not been wrongfully committed, he is guilty no DNA needed and he got just under 20 years, I'll ask again where is the justice in the case?Okay. Every time we find that there has been somebody wrongfully killed we get to kill a member of your immediate family.
We are not animals though, so we will let you choose each time. You can even give your reasoning as to why you picked them.
And this is the problem. You don't get to pick and choose.This lad has not been wrongfully committed, he is guilty no DNA needed and he got just under 20 years, I'll ask again where is the justice in the case?
This lad has not been wrongfully committed, he is guilty no DNA needed and he got just under 20 years, I'll ask again where is the justice in the case?
But 'extreme' would then be diluted until the inevitable killing of someone wrongfully convicted.Also I certainly ain't disagreeing with alot of these comments but what I'm saying is in extreme cases like this where there is no unreasonable doubt that he committed this hideous crime, this is where the death penalty should be used, that's my opinion.
It's a playground argument; like a lot of political discourse it's looking for a simple answer to a complicated question.Also I certainly ain't disagreeing with alot of these comments but what I'm saying is in extreme cases like this where there is no unreasonable doubt that he committed this hideous crime, this is where the death penalty should be used, that's my opinion.
That's where we differ. Fear of wrongful conviction isn't what make me oppose it, although it's a useful backup argument.Also I certainly ain't disagreeing with alot of these comments but what I'm saying is in extreme cases like this where there is no unreasonable doubt that he committed this hideous crime, this is where the death penalty should be used, that's my opinion.
In the USA it's more expensive, generally speaking, to execute someone rather than give them life in prison.How much will 30-40 years in prison cost?
Im against the death penalty too, there’s just no easy solution
Each to there own chutneyThat's where we differ. Fear of wrongful conviction isn't what make me oppose it, although it's a useful backup argument.
It's not an either/or is it?This lad has not been wrongfully committed, he is guilty no DNA needed and he got just under 20 years, I'll ask again where is the justice in the case?
Surely he will never get out. Someone capable of chopping their wife into over 200 pieces can't be rehabilitated. He is clearly mentally disturbed and does not belong in society.What the actual fcuk, another example of our joke of a justice system.
You can't tell me that the death penalty can't be used on someone like this!!
sentenced to a minimum term of 19 years and 316 days behind bars!!!
Nicholas Metson
How would the family of the first person wrongly executed feel?Each to there own chutney, in the case which I've posted and in my opinion he should pay the full consequence of his actions and at the very minimum be never allowed out of his cell again, life should mean life. Also I wonder how the poor girls family feel with that sentence he has received.
I know minimum is the key word here, but her family have to live with the knowledge they guy could be walking the streets as a 47 year old man having done that.What the actual fcuk, another example of our joke of a justice system.
You can't tell me that the death penalty can't be used on someone like this!!
sentenced to a minimum term of 19 years and 316 days behind bars!!!
Nicholas Metson
let them suffer in prison, let everyone know what they’ve done and they will not have an easy time.
If they did that the next step would be to overturn election results - like Donald Trump thinks he should be able toIf this government gets its way they will be able to overturn court judgements and make their own decisions. Quite a terrifying prospect.
When people commit suicide after committing some heinous crime it is sometimes said 'they took the easy way out'. Then say want the death penalty to have them killedI think this is the bit I have an issue with i think.
We’re not locking him up with an intention of “rehabilitating” him… we’re locking him away in a cell for the next 40 years to keep him away from society and so we can say “well, at least we didn’t just kill him.”