Boro Mayor Meltdown…

To avoid all doubt. I wonder if the mayor will post his?


View attachment 55650
Whilst not disagreeing or wanting to take anything away from your point. That DBS is only as good as the date it was conducted, if it is from a few years ago there is wiggle room in his point, not sure this is something you should use in this instance if it is not recent.
That being said Preston is crook.
 
Whilst not disagreeing or wanting to take anything away from your point. That DBS is only as good as the date it was conducted, if it is from a few years ago there is wiggle room in his point, not sure this is something you should use in this instance if it is not recent.
That being said Preston is crook.
The Lodger has no criminal record therefore no one should go on the record claiming he is a crook.
It is plain wrong.
 
The Lodger has no criminal record therefore no one should go on the record claiming he is a crook.
It is plain wrong.
That's not what I am saying, I was just advising caution and warning of some of the possible comebacks and wiggle room it could leave Mr Preston.

Edit ignore this, I think I have missread your response.
 
Unless The Lodger works for, or has applied for a job, with whoever applied for the DBS. Then, If not with his permission. Isn’t that a bit dodgy
 
Last edited:
Is it not also plain wrong for Mr Preston to be labelled a crook then? Unless, of course, he does have a criminal record
Surely it would be up to him to take action against people that claim he is a crook, rather than throw that mud at other people. If he has no evidence of it then that makes him dishonest and cowardly
 
Back
Top