I saw somebody postulate this exact scenario yesterday. That he himself wouldn't have it, but that an unnamed household member would have it, to avoid public appearance and scrutinyHow coincidental, after a $**** day for Boris the Buffon. "Somebody in his house hold" has just tested positive for covid. He is now isolating so cannot be contacted. What a crock of lies.
as is anyone that would consider voting to put him in power ever againHiding because he’s been found out, not because he thinks he did anything wrong.
Utterly pathetic man.
Yes you don't isolate you test instead. Actually I would have to check as to how that applies to a very close household contact.Don't the rules state that if someone in your household has Covid, but you test negative and are fully vaccinated, you don't have to isolate?
We had a household case about 2 weeks ago, and as I'm triple jabbed and showing no symptoms, I didn't have to isolate. That was the info I got from Track & Trace.Yes you don't isolate you test instead. Actually I would have to check as to how that applies to a very close household contact.
Even if he was isolating how come he can't be contacted? Does 10 downing Street not have WiFi?