NYboro
Well-known member
Yes I did. Would you care to point out the inaccuracies?Your verbosity is matched only by your inaccuracies,. Did you complain about labour winning in the Blair years.
Yes I did. Would you care to point out the inaccuracies?Your verbosity is matched only by your inaccuracies,. Did you complain about labour winning in the Blair years.
No, the people were asked to vote FOR a candidate, usually representing a party.
The rules are unmistakably clear.
More people voted for something other than a Conservative government when Cameron first got in and there was still a Con ruled govt. As part of a coalition that is inevitable in PR, where there is virtually always a government where more people voted FOR something other than for it.
Your theoretical points are just that, not playing the man, merely responding to him.. Hope that helps.
Outlandish, what a sensitive soul you are, the rest is just your opinion., goodnight, watch the Tories don't bite.The rules are very clear and they are undemocratic for the reasons already set out. I’m not sure I follow the rest of your post to be honest, it doesn’t make sense. You seem to be arguing that coalition governments are a reason that PR is worse than FPTP. Why? It isn’t borne out by any evidence or studies. Coalitions are usually stable, and there is no evidence of persistent instability in countries that use PR. Instead, voters are more accurately represented.
You make outlandish statements that I’ve been ‘caught out’ and that I’m asserting that all previous elections should be null and void. I show that up for the nonsense it is. You then talk about semantics, pedantry and theoretical points because you haven’t the intellectual capacity to respond in any other way. So yes it helps greatly.
Outlandish, what a sensitive soul you are, the rest is just your opinion., goodnight, watch the Tories don't bite.
I think it's more the fact that the the Tory party has gone so far right that even a moderate left Labour is closer to his 'one nation tory' notion than the Tory Party
You are an idiot or deliberately inflammatoryThey had a referendum in 2011 to change the voting system, computer never said no but the voters did.
The only way to be progressive as a country is to have coalition, you need more than one parties views pressing their ideology on the countryNo, the people were asked to vote FOR a candidate, usually representing a party.
The rules are unmistakably clear.
More people voted for something other than a Conservative government when Cameron first got in and there was still a Con ruled govt. As part of a coalition that is inevitable in PR, where there is virtually always a government where more people voted FOR something other than for it.
Check out mf pomposity.Do you understand what outlandish means? Apparently not.
And what do you think your post is, idiotYou are an idiot or deliberately inflammatory
There are imperfections with FPTP, but it is clear and simple, is understood and does give a result that more people voted FOR than anything else.
I'm not Coluka, remember his name fromrom when I was posting here before on the old board.As for partisan approach, this board is rife with it, labour good Tories bad regardless.
And what do you think your post is, idiot
Have a little empathy mate. It must be awful to remember Coluka's name 'fromrom'. I don't even know what that means but it sounds absolutely terrifying.Jesus. I’m only 2 pages into reading this thread and already it is completely transparent what you are all about, the games you want to play and the agenda you want to push. So so so many usernames down the years have come and gone with the exact same style.
Anyway, will read on and hopefully I’ll get to the end and will be proved wrong but it’s all so very familiar so far.
It's like At the start of a season everyone knows the rules regarding playoffs, then when a team finishes third with a big points margin over fourth place complaining they should be promoted. Dems the rules boys.
Not really. I doubt anybody would support holding a UKPGE with the FPTP rules and then changing it to PR during the count.
It'd be more like people knowing the playoff rules at the start of the one season and then the rules changing before the start of the next season and everyone still knowing about it.
What's the harm in that? Didn't the playoffs used to involve the team 3rd bottom of the 1st division? So we have had playoff rule changes between seasons before anyway.
Is that all you've got, a mistake when I was using my phone?. any reasonable person would see it was meant to be one "from.. Be better.Have a little empathy mate. It must be awful to remember Coluka's name 'fromrom'. I don't even know what that means but it sounds absolutely terrifying.
Not really. I doubt anybody would support holding a UKPGE with the FPTP rules and then changing it to PR during the count.
It'd be more like people knowing the playoff rules at the start of the one season and then the rules changing before the start of the next season and everyone still knowing about it.
What's the harm in that? Didn't the playoffs used to involve the team 3rd bottom of the 1st division? So we have had playoff rule changes between seasons before anyway.
My point is until the voting system is changed, everyone knows the system,it seems some only complain when it's the wrong result.Im not saying it shouldn't be changed but the last referendum on it,it was knocked back.Not really. I doubt anybody would support holding a UKPGE with the FPTP rules and then changing it to PR during the count.
It'd be more like people knowing the playoff rules at the start of the one season and then the rules changing before the start of the next season and everyone still knowing about it.
What's the harm in that? Didn't the playoffs used to involve the team 3rd bottom of the 1st division? So we have had playoff rule changes between seasons before anyway.
it seems some only complain when it's the wrong result.
but the last referendum on it,it was knocked back.