Boro_Legend
Well-known member
How Fletcher's last season at Boro turned sour as the axe falls
Assombalonga and Fletcher have both played their last game for the club
www.gazettelive.co.uk
Clearly someone is giving him that though otherwise he wouldn't be going. Warnock has pretty much said as much.Fletcher annoys me more than Britt. At least Britt has generally been fit and scored some goals during his time here.
What has Fletcher done? He's been mostly crap or injured (including a terrible loan spell at Sunderland where he was widely ridiculed). I'm not exactly sure who he thinks is going to give him and his daft agent mega bucks in the current climate. He is too crap for a relegated team looking at Automatic promotion and no one else will have money.
I think the questions were asked by the guy who has dropped the £40m and those responsible are no longer here.Clearly someone is giving him that though otherwise he wouldn't be going. Warnock has pretty much said as much.
I know what you mean though, he has had a lot of injuries and bar a few good goals, he hasn't given a lot back.
Its the amount of money we have wasted on Britt and Fletcher that's annoyed me (not to mention a few others like Gestede!). We are talking close to £40m for those two in transfer fees and wages. FORTY MILLION POUNDS!!!
I have no issues with taking a chance on a player, but when you are paying those sums and wages there needs to be some level of assurance that they are going to deliver, especially in the championship. To get diddly squat on your investment is scandalous and questions need to be asked.
Clearly someone is giving him that though otherwise he wouldn't be going. Warnock has pretty much said as much.
I know what you mean though, he has had a lot of injuries and bar a few good goals, he hasn't given a lot back.
Its the amount of money we have wasted on Britt and Fletcher that's annoyed me (not to mention a few others like Gestede!). We are talking close to £40m for those two in transfer fees and wages. FORTY MILLION POUNDS!!!
I have no issues with taking a chance on a player, but when you are paying those sums and wages there needs to be some level of assurance that they are going to deliver, especially in the championship. To get diddly squat on your investment is scandalous and questions need to be asked.
Gary Gill and Neil Bausor are still at the club. One is our Head of Recruitment and the other is our Chief Executive. What questions were asked of those two? They both seem untouchable.I think the questions were asked by the guy who has dropped the £40m and those responsible are no longer here.
I don’t know, I wasted ten minutes of my life trying to read the article to not find out. Five minutes reading and five watching ads jump about.What were his demands?
Maybe a bigger part of salary towards number of points in the season. They the will have more than pride to play for. Money money money. Its clear that pride does not existI don't know the answer but the terms written in contracts has to better weighted on the side of those paying the money. We have been royally shafted by this pair.
Maybe something like if the club receives an offer after half the contract period of a certain amount - half the fee paid then the club has the right to sell. After all the players have their release clauses on transfer fees.
Just glad theyre gone r00fieReally glad that the club is building a reputation for not bowing to unrealistic wage demands. The scenario with Ayala and Friend last season pointed the way forward. We all know that Britt and Fletcher were reportedly on Premiership wages. Neither delivered on their promise.
Neils get-what-you-see approach: no commitment = No Deal, [i.e its not just down to money] - is in the best interest of the club and ultimately us fans.
He said this week next seasons team "will be my team - my players". I believe he means it.
I was told Gill has left.Gary Gill and Neil Bausor are still at the club. One is our Head of Recruitment and the other is our Chief Executive. What questions were asked of those two? They both seem untouchable.
Hi LinkedIn Profile would also back this theory.I was told Gill has left.
If that was the case, nobody would ever sign anyone.I have no issues with taking a chance on a player, but when you are paying those sums and wages there needs to be some level of assurance that they are going to deliver, especially in the championship. To get diddly squat on your investment is scandalous and questions need to be asked.
No one has mentioned anyone being sacked. However, decisions can and should be scrutinised. There's been plenty of talk over the last few years - Pulis coming in to "have a look at the club and advise Steve", Changing the identify of the club only to go back on it in less than a year later. The Gazette dared to scrutinise what was going on and many of their journos were banned from the stadium!Gill has gone, Bausor is really just Gibson's implementer. Gibson is hardly going to sack himself for agreeing to back the Head of Recruitment and the manager in their choices.