Subbuteo_171
Well-known member
.
Last edited:
I like Tav, but he absolutely did not play well.Tav played well and Watmore looked good.
McNair was below par and McGree was dreadful!
The keeper didEntire team looked off the pace again, making basic errors and struggling to control the ball.
You can blame the forwards for many things, but they are feeding off absolute scraps as the quality of delivery is exceptionally poor.
The midfield needs massive work, there simply is no ball carrier. McGree and Tavernier cannot play together again.
McGree does nothing at pace and every touch takes him backwards, Bola has reverted to one of his "cant do anything right phases, McNair was out battled and out fought by Jordan Rhodes whilst Bamba would have looked out of place in the local pub league.
I genuinely can't think of a single positive from that game.
Absolutely shocking.
A difference of opinions. I thought it was pretty standard from Daniels.. he let two goals in let’s not forget. Better than Lumley?I like Tav, but he absolutely did not play well.
Bar Daniels, it was a consistently poor individual and team performance.
I know you prefer Lumley, but can't see how you can think Daniels didn't play ok. He was solid, and made a couple of decent savesA difference of opinions. I thought it was pretty standard from Daniels.. he let two goals in let’s not forget. Better than Lumley?
He offers much less with his distribution and quick recycling of possession.
When Tav is strutting around with his pet lip out ,instead of getting on with the game , he got what he deserved.Wow.
You loved the Huddersfield fans taunting one of our players?
Idiotic comment.
But isnt that the way moneyball is played nowadays, 50 passes along the back line, 2 forward then back to the keeper, who starts another 50 passes along the back line, not my cup of tea.Out thought & outfought , nothing happens at any pace at all , sides just fill the gaps easily because we move the ball so slowly