YouGov Poll - 33 Point lead!

Laughing said:
Me and nads were peas in a pod. I was regularly emailing her, which I think she looked forward to, though I don't know as she never wrote back. Bitch!

It was nice to get shot, even had she been labour I would have wanted shot of her. She did nothing to represent her constituents.
Click to expand...

Yeah exactly she was a nightmare nationally, but nobody knows how good she was locally as she was never there, she was too busy sucking off Boris.
 
I realise you shouldn't really do this, but it's just a bit of fun:

If you compare the two recent MRP polls, Survation has the Tories winning 98 seats at the next election whilst YouGov has them winning 155. However, analysing the individual seat predictions, Survation actually has the Tories holding onto 20 seats that YouGov predicts they will lose.

So, worst-case scenario (or best, depending on your viewpoint) the Tories could actually be as low as 78 seats. Of course, you could argue the opposite and say that they might win 175 seats (which would still be disastrous for them), but I prefer to dream.

Personally, I don't give much credence to the Survation MRP poll. They've got the SNP winning 41 seats in Scotland and the Lib Dems only winning 22 seats nationally, neither of which seem to reflect current political reality.
 
My worst case is that Labour get a bit complacent but I don't think Starmer will allow them to do that.

I think the Tories have a problem in Sunak. He's a terrible communicator.

Starmer wasn't very good when he first came in, in terms of the general media interaction, although he was okay when speaking to individual people but has improved in media interviews and speeches.

Sunak, though, wow. He's what AI would come up with if someone wanted to create a politician with no personality. He's going to be so exposed in the upcoming election cycles.
 
Capybara said:
Interesting that people find this post hilarious.
Click to expand...
What's even more interesting is that people have difficulty understanding the definition of a psychopath.
Yet they wildly bandy the term around because the man and the political party they detest will shortly be in power.
 
LessoftheLip said:
What's even more interesting is that people have difficulty understanding the definition of a psychopath.
Yet they wildly bandy the term around because the man and the political party they detest will shortly be in power.
Click to expand...
"Psychopath: A person who is manipulative, dishonest, narcissistic, unremorseful, non-empathetic, and exploitative"

As Meatloaf might have said, "Four out of Six ain't bad".

And the point I was making was more to do with the commentariat not making any pretence that this wasn't the plan all along. I find that quite worrying.

LessoftheLip said:
Has anyone ever seen Scrote and Owen Jones in the same room?
Click to expand...
Interesting that you pick one of the few members of said commentariat that has broken ranks and seriously begun to question what the heck is going on.

LessoftheLip said:
Cry more.
Click to expand...
Grow up, more.
 
Starmer does not pass the psychopath checklist, scrotes description isn’t complete or accurate.

Robert Hare is the psychologist that created the test for psychopathy. With a rating of 0-2 given for each category.

  • Item 1: Glibness/superficial charm
  • Item 2: Grandiose sense of self-worth
  • Item 3: Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
  • Item 4: Pathological lying
  • Item 5: Conning/manipulative
  • Item 6: Lack of remorse or guilt
  • Item 7: Shallow affect
  • Item 8: Callous/lack of empathy
  • Item 9: Parasitic lifestyle
  • Item 10: Poor behavioral controls
  • Item 11: Promiscuous sexual behavior
  • Item 12: Early behavior problems
  • Item 13: Lack of realistic long-term goals
  • Item 14: Impulsivity
  • Item 15: Irresponsibility
  • Item 16: Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
  • Item 17: Many short-term marital relationships
  • Item 18: Juvenile delinquency
  • Item 19: Revocation of conditional release
  • Item 20: Criminal versatility

Starmer doesn’t come close to the points required, it’s a silly claim, in fact I’d go so far as to say ludicrous.

Trump is a better example of a psychopath. I’ve seen Trump rated at 35, and would be higher but for his extreme wealth meaning 19 scores low.

Starmer would score below 10, I.e. not a psychopath. Edit: I meant to say you need 25 points to be considered a psychopath. It says far more about the people that label Starmer a psychopath than it says about Starmer himself. I think even Johnson is probably only around the border of psychopathy and he’s 100 times more repulsive than Starmer
 
Last edited:
Scrote said:
Grow up, more.
Click to expand...
What's become noticeable is the closer we get to a Starmer led Labour administration the louder the whining from the likes of Jones. Like quite a few posters on here he's so needy he must announce publicly that he's given up his Labour membership.

And why now?

Of all of the events that have occurred during the period of his membership when one might have had some understanding of a public flounce he chooses now; when nothing has really happened to trigger his strop.

Like I said, go cry a little more.
 
LessoftheLip said:
What's become noticeable is the closer we get to a Starmer led Labour administration the louder the whining from the likes of Jones. Like quite a few posters on here he's so needy he must announce publicly that he's given up his Labour membership.

And why now?

Of all of the events that have occurred during the period of his membership when one might have had some understanding of a public flounce he chooses now; when nothing has really happened to trigger his strop.

Like I said, go cry a little more.
Click to expand...
They are not Labour people that’s why they slag off Starmer because he is doing well…for Labour.
 
BoroMart said:
Starmer does not pass the psychopath checklist, scrotes description isn’t complete or accurate.

Robert Hare is the psychologist that created the test for psychopathy. With a rating of 0-2 given for each category.

  • Item 1: Glibness/superficial charm
  • Item 2: Grandiose sense of self-worth
  • Item 3: Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
  • Item 4: Pathological lying
  • Item 5: Conning/manipulative
  • Item 6: Lack of remorse or guilt
  • Item 7: Shallow affect
  • Item 8: Callous/lack of empathy
  • Item 9: Parasitic lifestyle
  • Item 10: Poor behavioral controls
  • Item 11: Promiscuous sexual behavior
  • Item 12: Early behavior problems
  • Item 13: Lack of realistic long-term goals
  • Item 14: Impulsivity
  • Item 15: Irresponsibility
  • Item 16: Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
  • Item 17: Many short-term marital relationships
  • Item 18: Juvenile delinquency
  • Item 19: Revocation of conditional release
  • Item 20: Criminal versatility

Starmer doesn’t come close to the points required, it’s a silly claim, in fact I’d go so far as to say ludicrous.

Trump is a better example of a psychopath. I’ve seen Trump rated at 35, and would be higher but for his extreme wealth meaning 19 scores low.

Starmer would score below 10, I.e. not a psychopath. Edit: I meant to say you need 25 points to be considered a psychopath. It says far more about the people that label Starmer a psychopath than it says about Starmer himself. I think even Johnson is probably only around the border of psychopathy and he’s 100 times more repulsive than Starmer
Click to expand...
I think you are being very kind labelling Scrotes comments as ludicrous. I could think of far more disparaging descriptions.
 
ThePrisoner said:
What does that mean?
Click to expand...
Its when you get released early from prison for good behaviour but then ignore the terms that you signed up to, because sociatal rules are irrelevant to you. You end up having your early release revoked and going back to prison to serve out the rest of your sentence. I guess the thinking is that psychos are able to manipulate and con and fake contrition to gain early release, but they never change their spots, they will always look to manipulate, abuse, lie, and cheat.
 
BoroMart said:
Starmer does not pass the psychopath checklist, scrotes description isn’t complete or accurate.

Robert Hare is the psychologist that created the test for psychopathy. With a rating of 0-2 given for each category.
Click to expand...


It is also very alarming that Hare's opinions are widely accepted and applied in
the forensic psychiatric world. In this article the scientific basis of Hare's claims
and opinions as well as the usefulness and reliability of his checklist will be
examined and discussed.
Click to expand...

It was concluded that, a) this checklist is a not a reliable tool, b) the conclusions that are linked to these PCL-R scores with regard to the treatability of psychopaths are incorrect, harmful and unethical, c) can easily be misused in legal systems and forensic psychiatric settings to dispose of problematic psychopaths, and d) the diagnostic category psychopathy should be rejected firmly because some items are subjective, vague, judgmental and practically unmeasurable, and the term psychopathy itself seems to be judgmental
Click to expand...
This Robert Hare checklist?
[Quotations from Medicine & Law, 2008 (Med Law (2008) 27:449-462)]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top